Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: daniel1212
... one would argue that all that a translation contains means all such is considered Scripture, ...

One can find the claim that the Apocrypha was removed from the Authorized Version (Protestant) English translation to save on costs unpersuasive.

The Apocrypha controversy of the 1820s was a debate around the British and Foreign Bible Society, and the issue of the inclusion of the Apocrypha in Bibles it printed for missionary work. The Society did include the Apocrypha in Bibles for use in continental Europe, where it was normal for Protestant as well as Catholic readers to have the texts of the Apocrypha. Robert Haldane criticised this policy.[1]

The British and Foreign Bible Society had in fact dropped the Apocrypha from its bibles published in English in 1804. This decision broke with the tradition of Myles Coverdale, of consolidating the Apocrypha between the two Testaments.[2]

Haldane and William Thorpe began a general campaign in 1821, against all Bibles with the Apocrypha and their printing with funds raised from British sources. The Society was divided over the issue, but the majority view favoured the existing policy of case-by-case inclusion. In Spring 1826 an attempt to reach a compromise with the Haldane ("Recordite") view broke down. As a result, the major Scottish branches in Edinburgh and Glasgow left the Society. Most Scottish branches followed, and a few in England.[3]



... British Dissenters, particularly Scottish Presbyterians, objected to the inclusion of the deuterocanonical books in the Bible on doctrinal grounds and forced a split in the British and Foreign Bible Society. So it was not about saving money; it was about getting rid of the deuterocanonical books from the Bible.
153 posted on 10/15/2019 5:33:24 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]


To: af_vet_1981
... British Dissenters, particularly Scottish Presbyterians, objected to the inclusion of the deuterocanonical books in the Bible on doctrinal grounds and forced a split in the British and Foreign Bible Society. So it was not about saving money; it was about getting rid of the deuterocanonical books from the Bible.

For them, which goes back to the reason for it, which was established thru many posts before you showed up with your ignorant or sophistical and diversionary trolling. Will your ignorant vain attempts ever cease?

155 posted on 10/16/2019 2:08:55 AM PDT by daniel1212 ( Trust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + follow Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson