See Post 17.
Sure I may have low balled a “five-figure” claim by misreading it into, that’s a mistake.
What is the point of this again? Beyond jumping down my throat for a figure that doesn’t exist except as an illustration of something that doesn’t exist?
Well, it does exist. If it didn’t then there would be a canon law or some other official statement that there are NO charges for an unbiblical annulment.