The book of the Revelation says that the New Jerusalem has come down - Christianity. And the new Temple is the Lord Himself.
The new Temple is the Lord - Jesus’s body
So no hail stones,or meteors that turned the oceans dead? No dead witnesses that God catches up to heaven? No Satan actually bound for a literal 1000 years before being loosed again for a short season? Nothing in history that you can cite that makes your view of “Apocalypse” valid? Just a bunch of hypersymbolized interpretations?
Actaully his church is the real new temple of which Christ is the chief cornerstone with the preachings of the prophets and apostles as part of the foundation and we members are its living stones set into place as the Spirit ordains. We are also “his bride”. Yet these symbolized images, depicting a true spiritual reality don’t cancel out the rest of the nitty gritty realities which Revelation also describes such as a real life “Beast” and supporting supranational structure” and a false prophet and an image people are forced to worship...or the fight he has with the two witnesses and the celebration the entire world has when the Beast is allowed to kill them and leave them lying there for 3 days and nights! Nero never had supernatural powers nor did he or any other Ceasar ever rise seemingly from the dead after a mortal head wound! Yet if you could cite from history if such things had occurred in the past then your other statements might have relevance. If you would discount what Revelation has to say about those matters then you have to discount the rest of Apocalypse since the nitty gritty prophecies and the symbolic passages do hang and fit together...you can’t have one, the symbolism, without the other or the nitty gritty. A massive Earth wide hail storm with ice the size of boulders and all Islands being removed from their places...somebody would have written about it somewhere in time!