Posted on 07/17/2019 9:45:43 PM PDT by ReformationFan
Just as its loudest opponents feared, granting same-sex couples access to marriage has further aligned the hoary institution with sexual choice, helping sever the link between sex and diapers—at just the moment when abortion rights face their greatest test in a generation.
If you want to understand the sexual revolution in a nutshell, read Nathaniel Frank’s Washington Post column from a few days ago. He argues that the gay rights movement has been at the forefront of decoupling sex from procreation and of establishing sexual liberation as a driving norm. Frank writes:
(Excerpt) Read more at theaquilareport.com ...
It is because what takes place between two persons of the same sex is not only not procreative but not sex!
Two persons of the same sex cannot reproduce, the essential feature of genuine sexuality.
What they share is homoeroticism, not homosexuality; that is an ersatz word for something that does not exist.
Those who practice birth control are no different than homosexuals with regard to denying the possibility of children.
Griswald vs Conn 1965 opened up this can of worms.
Excellent reasoning.
How the Hebrews underpinned Western Civilization.
F*ck the sexual revolution!
Interesting read
We the People . . . to secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity . . .
Bookmark.
I’ve seen that article before. An eye opener.
Didn’t realize the Jews and Christians made men [more] civil. How, though, did they get men to behave? Perhaps misbehavior was rewarded by death.
I have just finished Prager’s commentaries on Genesis and Exodus. Exodus is now part of my grandsons’ homeschool curriculum. Genesis will follow in time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.