I’m not saying the Francis is the worst Pope ever, but someone has to be the worst Pope ever.
Of course one would be sorely tempted to doubt by the worst Pope ever.
In general, the article and argument proves a point demonstrated repeatedly: for the most part, Jesuits should not be let near moral theology.
Disclaimer: I am Oratorian trained, ant the Oratorians, along with the Carmelites, are traditionally fellow-travelers with the Domincans.
Apparently you do not take issue with the assertion that Francis is in fact teaching schism or heresy in his (presumed) official capacity as Pope.
Can you, therefor, demonstrate where in official Church teaching it may be found that it is possible for a true Pope to do so (that is, tempt believers to doubt)?!
Or is it, rather, an un-Catholic position to state that the present Pope, from his teaching authority, is tempting the faithful to sin?