Soon people within the Church argue that the “resignation” of Pope Benedict was coerced and not valid. The election of Bergoglio was illegitimate and his reign was a usurpation during which Benedict was the sole legitimate successor to Peter. If Benedict outlives Bergoglio, this proposition may be formally adopted by the Curiae.
What has me worried are the “abdominal practices” alleged to be current and ongoing within Church precincts, as per the concluding lines in the posted excerpt, in addition to all the abominable practices listed.
The mention of protestants negates the Caucus protection.
I’m not saying the Francis is the worst Pope ever, but someone has to be the worst Pope ever.
Of course one would be sorely tempted to doubt by the worst Pope ever.
In general, the article and argument proves a point demonstrated repeatedly: for the most part, Jesuits should not be let near moral theology.
Disclaimer: I am Oratorian trained, ant the Oratorians, along with the Carmelites, are traditionally fellow-travelers with the Domincans.
Yes, he has!