Posted on 05/04/2019 3:04:32 AM PDT by Gamecock
Major theological issues can sometimes show up in the most surprising places.
The Financial Times reigns as one of the most influential periodicals in the worldit is the reading assignment of the Davos class, and it rivals the influence of The New York Times and The Washington Post. The Financial Times leads the newspaper world in its insightful analysis, cultural critique, and economic breakdown of the most pressing issues facing the globe. It is a paper not read by the faint-hearted.
And, it is the very paper that recently ran this surprising headline, A Preacher for Trumps America: Joel Osteen and the Prosperity Gospel.
Edward Luce, the American Editor for the Financial Times, penned this article, which chronicles his visit to Lakewood Church, the most significant temple to the prosperity gospel in America. Luce marshals all his prowess and analytical skill to craft this insightful articlea story that explores the friction between the prosperity gospel of Joel Osteen and the historic, orthodox Christian faith.
Luces report not only details what is present in prosperity theology, but what is absent. He attended a mens support meeting and wrote, Optimism, hope, destiny, harvest, bountythese are Lakewoods buzzwords. Prosperity too. Then, he reveals the glaring absence of crucial theological terms: Words that are rarely heard include guilt, shame, sin, penance and hell. Lakewood is not the kind of church that troubles your conscience. The supervisor of the mens support group said to Luce, If you want to feel bad, Lakewood is not the place for you. Most people want to leave church feeling better than when they went in.
This statement distills the essential message of prosperity theologya theology not centered on God and his glory, but an anthropocentric psychological message aimed at making individuals merely feel better about themselves.
Indeed, self-promotion undergirds the success of the prosperity gospel. All meaning and significance in the universe revolves around the self. Thus, meaning and identity have shifted away from the self-revealing, self-existing God and towards the self-important, self-worshiping individual whom God loves.
God certainly loves us. Indeed, the Bible says, For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son. The prosperity gospel, however, shifts the impetus of that love away from the praise and glory of the Creator towards the praise and glory of the creature. Luce captures this sentiment in his report, noting that Osteen said, If God had a refrigerator, your picture would be on it. If he had a computer, your face would be the screen saver.
Osteen has reversed the entire theological order of biblical Christianityan order that begins with the supreme priority, glory, and holiness of God. God and God alone receives the glory. The manifestation of his love through Jesus Christ demonstrates himself to be both just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Christ. Osteen, however, reverses the polarity and makes God the great admirer of the individual.
Luce had the opportunity to meet with Osteen and interview him privately. During that interview, Osteen candidly offered his biblically anemic theology that in no way resembles the teachings of Christ. Luce asked Osteen how he managed to keep sin and redemption out of his supposedly Christian message. Osteen responded, Look, Im a preachers son, so Im an optimist. Life already makes us feel guilty every day. If you keep laying shame on people, they get turned off.
The secular reporter for the Financial Times seems to have a stronger grasp on the teachings of orthodox Christianity than Osteen. Luce rightly asks how a message can parade as Christian when it avoids the idea of sin and redemption? Osteens response was not theological but psychological.
He offers that no individual should experience guilt or shamenot even for their sin against a holy and righteous God. Luce asks Osteen, How does telling people to downplay their consciences tally with the New Testament? Osteen retorts, I preach the gospel, but we are nondenominational. Its not my aim to dwell on technicalities. I want to help people sleep at night.
Osteen exchanges the eternal consequences of the gospels redemptive power through Jesus Christ for a thinly veiled mash of modern psychotherapy and positive thinking. His teaching is pop psychology that resembles the mantras of Oprah rather than the gospel of Jesus Christ.
After detailing his conversation with Osteen, Luce turned to analyzing his time with the prosperity preaching, writing, Osteen knows his audience. We want fatted calves slaughtered in our honor. There was no hint in his message of the fire and brimstone of a Billy Graham or a Jerry Falwell, two of Americas most celebrated 20th century evangelists. Osteen is more like Oprah Winfrey in a suit. He is not peddling the opium of the masses. It is more like therapy for a broken middle class.
As Luces article makes clear, Osteens message is a gold-mine. Indeed, Osteens false gospel works for him financially. As the article makes clear, Osteen received a $13 million advance for just one recent book. Luce details, With a fortune estimated at $60 million and a mansion listed on Zillow at $10.7 million, Osteen is hardly living like a friar. His suburban Houston home has three elevators, a swimming pool and parking for 20 cars including his $230,000 Ferrari 458 Italia.
Luce also cites in his report this quote from another prosperity gospel preacher, Paula White: Anyone who tells you to deny yourself is Satan.
Someone needs to tell Paula that Jesus actually said that we should deny ourselves, take up our crosses, and follow him. If you get Jesus confused with Satan, you have made an eternally fatal error.
Yet, the entire superstructure of prosperity theology peddles false theology from top to bottom. Osteen is quoted by saying, If you do your part, God will do his. He will promote you. He will give you the increase.
This amounts to an entire reversal of the gospel of Christ revealed in the Scriptures. Nowhere do the Scriptures tell mankind that if we just do our part, God will do his. Instead, the Bible reveals that God accomplished everything needed for our salvation through the sacrifice of Jesus Christ on his cross.
Perhaps the most horrifying statement in the Financial Times articles pertains to Osteens exegesis of Jesus last words on the cross, It is finished. Osteen does not believe that Jesus declared those words as an attestation of his imminent death and the atonement he made. Instead, Osteen preaches that It is finished, means, The guilt is finished. The depression is finished. The low self-esteem is finished. The mediocrity is finished. It is all finished.
Osteen has replaced the entire biblical message of Christ and what he accomplished at Golgotha. He has exchanged sacrificial atonement for self-absorption. When Christ declared, It is finished, he declared far more than the watered-down psychotherapy of Joel Osteenindeed, Christ declared that salvation had been secured; that death and the devil were defeated. The temple veil was torn in two, declaring the end of the sacrificial system because the perfect sacrifice had been made. Through Jesus Christ, we now have direct access to the Father.
That is the good news of the gospel; that is what Christians have understood to be the foundation of our hope as Gods people.
Osteen tragically exchanges the hope of gospel centered on Christ and his accomplished work for a wishy-washy, self-centered, self-exalting message of psychotherapy. He does not proclaim the gospel but a false hope. He turns the eyes of his audience away from the glory of the eternal God to a god who is a cosmic butler, waiting on our beck and call to give us health and wealth.
When we think about the theological competitors to the gospel of Jesus Christ, we immediately turn to the major world religions like Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, and Buddhism. We might even lump modern secularism into that category of theological competitors to the truth claims of Christianity.
But, in many parts of the world, the greatest competition for the hearts and minds of people is between biblical Christianity and the prosperity gospel.
And the central problem of the prosperity gospel is not that it offers too much, but that it offers too little. The gospel of Jesus Christ brings salvation, the forgiveness of sin, and life everlasting. The prosperity gospel promises a Ferrari. At least it did for Joel Osteen.
These two are pretty sound exposing false doctrine
Justin Peters: Dangerous Doctrines
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jvuhOa9wY4
End Times Part 1: Apostasy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpaYa6AAL44
concerning Paula White:
Corrupt preachers part 1, Paula White
I’ve watched Justin Peters before.,
He is good.
Also, the Kundalini Warning by Andrew Strorm.
Kundalini Warning (FULL) — Andrew Strorm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2r5fMUct_co
Thanks for the links.
Thanks, I’ve never heard of Andrew Strorm. I’ll have to check it out.
For a Ferrari? Absolutely not. However I am prone to Road Rage, so perhaps a fully functional Abrams tank...
I’m about halfway through the Kundalini link right now. I’ve never heard of this before. What a mockery this is of Acts 2 and the Day of Pentecost.
As I was about seven minutes into this I was reminded of the bizarre actions of Hillary Clinton while on the campaign trail:
Could it be a demonic spirit having overtaken her?
Hillary Clinton Bark and Bobblehead Seizure Show
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpphHCN5MAs
"God drove Adam and Eve from the garden in his Fury"
Seeing the fish symbol jogged my brain.
Maybe Jesus WOULD drive a fancier Infinity.
“I am the Alpha and Omega, the everlasting....”
I never thought of that before but now that you mention it........
Oh my.....
That would make perfect sense, wouldn’t it?
“Nowhere do the Scriptures tell mankind that if we just do our part, God will do his. Instead, the Bible reveals that God accomplished everything needed for our salvation through the sacrifice of Jesus Christ on his cross.”
The above quote was taken from Mohler in the OP. God has done His part in man’s salvation by sending His Son to die as a sacrifice on the cross. Yet man does have a part, a role in his own salvation and that part is obeying the Lord, Heb 5:9. Jesus Himself said those who doeth the will of the Father are the one who enter the kingdom, Matt 7:21. Even the rich young ruler (Luke 18) had a part in his own salvation in obeying the Lord in going and selling all he had, distribute to the poor and ‘come, follow me’. Yet his not doing his part left him being disobedient to the Lord and short of having salvation.
“the will of the Father” is that none should perish. In order to do our part, we must believe and repent.
2 Peter 3:9 King James Version (KJV)
9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Romans 10:9-10 King James Version (KJV)
9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
Ephesians 2:7-9 King James Version (KJV)
7 That in the ages to come he might shew the exceeding riches of his grace in his kindness toward us through Christ Jesus.
8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.
Eph 2:9 - not of works lest anyman should boast
Matt 7:21 he that doeth the will of my Father ...enters the kingdom
Since these two verses do not contradict, we can see that all works are not the same...
“not of works” refers to works of merit one might do to earn salvation. If one could earn salvation he could boast about that.
‘doeth the will of the Father’ refers to obedience to God’s will, (as believing repenting confession baptism). God’s free gift of salvation being conditional, therefore obedience is the necessary condition that must be met to receive that free gift.
Jesus gave an example of two sisters, Mary and Martha. One was “busy” and one remained at the feet of Jesus. Who had the better part?
Luke 1038-42 King James Version (KJV)
38 Now it came to pass, as they went, that he entered into a certain village: and a certain woman named Martha received him into her house.
39 And she had a sister called Mary, which also sat at Jesus’ feet, and heard his word.
40 But Martha was cumbered about much serving, and came to him, and said, Lord, dost thou not care that my sister hath left me to serve alone? bid her therefore that she help me.
41 And Jesus answered and said unto her, Martha, Martha, thou art careful and troubled about many things:
42 But one thing is needful: and Mary hath chosen that good part, which shall not be taken away from her.
Our justification remains at the foot of the Cross.
The Baptism spoken of in Romans Chapter 6 speaks of a Spiritual death, burial and resurrection with Christ. Not a water baptism. Yes, water baptism is Biblical, but not a requirement of Salvation. The same Crucifixion which granted our Salvation, also is able to Justify.
The problem with the mainline church today, they have added all these requirements to Salvation. The emphasis then becomes the self efforts rather than the Cross of Christ.
Romans 6 King James Version (KJV)
1 What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
2 God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?
3 Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?
4 Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
5 For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:
6 Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.
7 For he that is dead is freed from sin.
8 Now if we be dead with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with him:
9 Knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him.
10 For in that he died, he died unto sin once: but in that he liveth, he liveth unto God.
11 Likewise reckon ye also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord.
12 Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, that ye should obey it in the lusts thereof.
13 Neither yield ye your members as instruments of unrighteousness unto sin: but yield yourselves unto God, as those that are alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness unto God.
14 For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.
15 What then? shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace? God forbid.
16 Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?
17 But God be thanked, that ye were the servants of sin, but ye have obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine which was delivered you.
18 Being then made free from sin, ye became the servants of righteousness.
19 I speak after the manner of men because of the infirmity of your flesh: for as ye have yielded your members servants to uncleanness and to iniquity unto iniquity; even so now yield your members servants to righteousness unto holiness.
20 For when ye were the servants of sin, ye were free from righteousness.
21 What fruit had ye then in those things whereof ye are now ashamed? for the end of those things is death.
22 But now being made free from sin, and become servants to God, ye have your fruit unto holiness, and the end everlasting life.
23 For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.