Rome's Revision of the Lord's Prayer and the Coming Hour of Testing

Unsealed ^ | 12-17-2-18 | Jeff

[Chainmail]

Turns out, you were the one that can’t read. In all the Bible study you have done - both you and the author this piece missed out on the meaning of the word “Christian”.

[ealgeone]

Turns out, you were the one that can’t read. In all the Bible study you have done - both you and the author this piece missed out on the meaning of the word “Christian”.

You started this mess, junior. You might want to sit down.

[Chainmail]

Good luck making me, junior.

[ealgeone]

Shouldn't be too hard to do. You committed the blunder that started this little chat.

As I said before...deal with it.

[Chainmail]

1. The original post post was the first blunder; your response to me was the second.
2. Don’t start fights that you haven’t the ability to finish.

[ealgeone]

1. The original post post was the first blunder; your response to me was the second.

Dude:

Your post which started all of this.

To: amessenger4god

Blowhard.

One small correction: the Pope is not “self appointed” but the author of this piece is.

2 posted on 12/18/2018, 10:01:15 AM by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

Now compare that to the original article.

>>When the majority of Christendom doesn't know their right from their left when it comes to the Bible, should we just leave this one up to the self-appointed experts of Rome to solve this translational and interpretative puzzle?<<

I don't see anything in there that says what you claim..".....the Pope is not “self appointed” but the author of this piece is."

If you can't see the difference....and it's clear you can't, I really don't have the time to explain it to you.,

Now.

Sit.

Down.

You're embarrassing yourself if you continue.

[Chainmail]

"And for those of us who have studied history, how could we forget the unjust power plays from the Popes of Christmas past? When the majority of Christendom doesn't know their right from their left when it comes to the Bible, should we just leave this one up to the self-appointed experts of Rome to solve this translational and interpretative puzzle?"

As pointed out earlier by edwinland, this is the text within the post that was referred to. The author of that piece was both mistaken AND self-appointed, right?

I'll assume that English is your first language, so you should recognize that the author is referring to the pope as the "self-appointed expert of Rome", shouldn't you?

You decided that you were going to go after me and my Catholic faith and refer to me as "junior".

Let's talk about who should be embarrassed.

[ealgeone]

Yep...it was easy pickings.

[ealgeone]

I see your comprehension is not up to speed.

I don't have the time to try and explain it to you. It's there though if you look for it.

I'll leave it up to you to look for it.

[Salvation]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3713751/posts

The thread is about prayer.

Read the link from Jim Robinson about TROLLS.

[ealgeone]

You might want to re-read....or read, what edwinland actually wrote.

Here's a hint....read. it. slowly.

BTW....you began the name calling in your first post calling the poster of this thread a "blowhard".

I've noticed that with a lot of you Roman Catholics...ya'll have a short temper and a very thin skin.

I've also noticed the Roman Catholic is usually, though not always, the first to resort to a personal attack, in your case "blowhard", and or profanity.

I'll add another observation....when called on this the Roman Catholic continues to double down on their antics.

I guess the the nuns must have worked ya'll over as kids.

[Salvation]

Personal attack

[Mears]

bfl

[ealgeone]

I fail to see a "personal attack". I quote straight from the religionmoderator's page (perhaps you should read it). I highlighted the key part for you:

Posters may argue for or against beliefs, deities, religious authorities, etc. They may tear down other’s beliefs. They may ridicule. “Open” RF debate is often contentious.

It requires thick skin. A poster must be able to make his points while standing his ground, suffering adverse remarks about his beliefs - or letting them roll off his back.

Members of religions which are as much culture as belief sometimes take religious debate personally.

If you keep getting your feelings hurt because other posters ridicule or disapprove or hate what you hold dear, then you are too thin-skinned to be involved in “open” RF debate.

You should IGNORE “open” RF threads altogether and instead post to RF threads labeled “prayer” “devotional” “caucus” or “ecumenical.”

******************

My comment to you..... If these threads are too much for you, perhaps you should stay on the caucus threads where about two people may comment on your threads......I believe falls right in line with these guidelines.

[Jim Robinson]

Do not go out of your way to attack or ridicule anyone on FR, anywhere on FR.

[ealgeone]

No problem, boss!

[Mom MD]

Rome has self appointed herself as the only true church, the only church capable of interpreting scripture, and possessing a body of mystical knowledge equivalent to if not superior to scripture. I agree with the self appointed part.

[Mom MD]

Not everyone that disagrees with you is a troll.

[PeterPrinciple]

Heb_10:16 “This is the new covenant I will make with My people on that day, says the LORD: I will put My laws in their hearts, and I will write them on their minds.”

---

They didn’t read the part about God tearing the curtain in the temple, destroying the temple and replacing the sacrificial system. The RC rebuilt everything that God destroyed.

God says the new covenant is a direct relationship through the Holy Spirit.