Muhammad’s Bloody Creed, a book review by Geoffrey Luck

Quadrant periodical ^ | November 01 2018 | Geoffrey Luck

[rocknotsand]

"Once upon a time in a primitive land of polytheist idolaters far, far away, an egomaniac zealot with high ambitions hit on a bright idea. On learning of the ancient Jewish prophecy of a Messiah, and the newish Christian communities’ worship of Jesus as the “Chosen One”, he decided to nominate himself as the latest in the line – the Messenger of Allah and the Seal of the Prophets. If the Angel Gabriel could give the name ‘Jesus’ to Mary, why couldn’t Gabriel be recruited to authenticate Muhammad’s pronouncements?

The polytheists who worshipped 360 idols in the Ka’aba of Mecca thought this was fake news and made life difficult for the would-be prophet-poet. In thirteen years he attracted only 150 followers. So he decamped to another town. The Jews of Medina first welcomed him as a protector, but after they heard his story about travelling to Jerusalem and then to Paradise on a winged white horse with a human head, and questioned him on religion, they declared him a phony...

[rocknotsand]

Would be good Christmas gift! Light travel reading on holidays... LOL. Got to buy this book before the Social Lists order it destroyed. Or the banks stop processing the payments. Or the postal union votes not to ship it... or something similar.

[Russ]

Or the crazed Islamic zealots get hold of a list of all those who purchased the book.

[Carriage Hill]

I hope Mr Luck is carrying concealed, w/ extra hi-cap mags.

[rocknotsand]

Unfortunately, down here LEOs and criminals have handguns... and the competition shooter communitys have them (under strict rules for use at ranges and for storage in safes as well etc).

[Carriage Hill]

Australia? I know that there were “mandatory gun turn-ins”, but is the whole population disarmed and vulnerable?

[rocknotsand]

This would also be a good thread to post a speech recently given at a protest in Great Britain. Sargon of Accad asks the question -after a murder of an english girl (and the grooming gang sentencings in general) WHAT IS GOING ON HERE? And he answers it in the best way I have heard so far. Without any fluff or elaborations. The salient points in this speech should be on billboards in England, and in Dearborn for that matter:

Um, I haven't really got anything prepared. ...Obviously I have been thinking about this grooming gang problem and its really weird how there is a lack of remorse from the men who conducted the grooming and it really comes down to a set of fundamental values that we need to discuss... and this is often conflated with identity, because identity is usually expressed as a collection of values and in the main people adhere to this, and it comes down to the essential liberal value that every human has value. Everyone has a fundamental amount of value, even if how terrible that person is they are still a human being and that means something whereas the people [in] these grooming gangs, the people actually taking advantage of these young girls, they don't see them as having any value at all -they see them as being completely worthless and they use these words. They say "You're worthless trash", "white" trash specifically. And so we're left in a position where we need to have a proper conversation, a proper National dialogue about what are, and what are not appropriate values for our society... and obviously, not thinking that the citizens of this country have value... is not appropriate. Thats... honestly, we have to push this conversation [as] the sort of conversation that the politicians address in Parliament because there are communities all across this country that simply don't agree with you on certain things and you need to have that discussion with them, because if we don't get these values nailed down, and get everyone to agree there are certain things on which we must agree... we're never gonna have peace, we're never gonna have integration and we're never gonna end the problems that we're having, things are just gonna keep getting worse. And if the Establishment keep saying, "Right, we're gonna punish you for speaking out about this", then people are just going to keep getting angrier and angrier and angrier. Its just going to exacerbate the problem and we're never gonna get past this. And thats more dangerous than anyone saying something racist, its way more dangerous than any viral video of a guy saying something rude to someone else on a train or racially harassing them... Its way more dangerous to tell the people of this country, who should be free, that they are not free to speak their mind even if what they have to say is repugnant. People should be free to say repugnant things and you should be free to completely rebuff what they've said -on the spot or on any public forum: there should be no limits to this. So thats the conclusion I've come to recently. Sorry I don't have anything a bit more, like, elaborate for everyone. I'll be walking around so let me know what you think. Thank you everyone.

Sargon mentions the "lack of remorse". The GOP campaign advert aired yesterday -to the shock of many TV Talking Heads- dwells on the same lack of remorse of a multiple cop killing murdering alien. "The Democrats Let Him In..."

[throwback]

Some suspect that the “Prophet” was in the spirit, just not the good one. Read the words written on the insides of the Dome of the Rock. If ever a religion was anti-christ, it is Islam.

[rocknotsand]

No. I was responding to a statement about handguns. Shotguns and rifles (not autos or semis btw) are legal if you pass a background and safety test. I use a range currently with lever actions. I purchased a Winchester Lever in 1976 (in a gunshop/fishing shop in the main street) with my first ever paycheck... and I still have it. A big seller herebouts lately is a lever shotgun... but I passed it back to the salesman after feeling how cheap and nasty it was.

[alloysteel]

Schizophrenia may not be a communicable disease, but it is certainly a genetic one, springing forth in unexpected places generation after generation. Once the fire of Islam takes hold in a susceptible mind, it leaves the victim with growing feelings of isolation and rage, that may only be expressed by lashing out and “changing” the environment to fit the preconceived notions.

This expression of anger usually involves wanton destruction in its wake. Chaos and war are the typical evidence of this continuing mental disorder.

[rocknotsand]

Sargon’s speech was off-the-cuff and -worse- without a microphone.

Wouldn’t it be good if this little concise speech goes viral or becomes important. This speech covers the problem of a peaceful lawful society facing a imported somewhat arrogant law-of-the-jungle sub-culture. It was 27 May 2018 at Speakers Corner London. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfDbpfgKM5E&;

[Carriage Hill]

“...lever shotgun...”

I’ve never seen one around here.

[Carriage Hill]

I found these on CTD, but haven’t ever seen on at a range.

https://www.cheaperthandirt.com/category/firearms/shotguns/lever-action.do

[rocknotsand]

Adler shotgun. imho, bet it falls apart before its 5 years old.
.... see in action at 1.30 mark in this demo video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAHEi3a08wE

[Lurkinanloomin]

The future must not belong to those who deny the true nature of Islam

John Quincy Adams on Islam

“In the seventh century of the Christian era, a wandering Arab of the lineage of Hagar, the Egyptian, combining the powers of transcendent genius, with the preternatural energy of a fanatic, and the fraudulent spirit of an impostor, proclaimed himself as a messenger from Heaven, and spread desolation and delusion over an extensive portion of the earth. Adopting from the sublime conception of the Mosaic law, the doctrine of one omnipotent God; he connected indissolubly with it, the audacious falsehood, that he was himself his prophet and apostle. Adopting from the new Revelation of Jesus, the faith and hope of immortal life, and of future retribution, he humbled it to the dust, by adapting all the rewards and sanctions of his religion to the gratification of the sexual passion. He poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the allowance of polygamy; and he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind. THE ESSENCE OF HIS DOCTRINE WAS VIOLENCE AND LUST: TO EXALT THE BRUTAL OVER THE SPIRITUAL PART OF HUMAN NATURE.

Between these two religions, thus contrasted in their characters, a war of twelve hundred years has already raged. That war is yet flagrant; nor can it cease but by the extinction of that imposture, which has been permitted by Providence to prolong the degeneracy of man. While the merciless and dissolute dogmas of the false prophet shall furnish motives to human action, there can never be peace upon earth, and good will towards men. The hand of Ishmael will be against every man, and every man’s hand against him. It is, indeed, amongst the mysterious dealings of God, that this delusion should have been suffered for so many ages, and during so many generations of human kind, to prevail over the doctrines of the meek and peaceful and benevolent Jesus” (Blunt, 1830, 29:269, capitals in orig.).