I think where we differ is on our definition of “originals”.
What I mean by “originals” is what manuscripts were used as source text to translate into English.
I would be interested in your definition for "error" also ...
Who are your list of scholars that claim every English translation has errors compared to the originals? Because at this point, with your own definition of original, your entire premise seems like your own musing.
Textus Receptus [Received Text] versus discarded Westcott/Hort.