Benedict XVI and the Jews: New Ratzinger Essay on Judaism causes Controversy

Novus Ordo Watch ^ | September 6, A.D. 2018 | Editor

[piusv]

So then the Catholic Church taught error and bigotry for 1960 years.

[Marchmain]

I don’t need to defend the Catholic Church. Your views are outmoded, you must defend. If that can be said about a long list of rules that you use only to tell people they’re wrong. You can call mimicry religion, I call it kindergarten.

[piusv]

No, if *my* views are outmoded then you are preaching that the *Catholic Church’s* views were outmoded. Which I totally expect from a Vatican II “religionist” who believes that Vatican II actually taught Catholic doctrine.

[af_vet_1981]

No, if *my* views are outmoded then you are preaching that the *Catholic Church’s* views were outmoded.

Logical fallacy (modus tollens) ?

[piusv]

Not a logical fallacy at all. Those that think it is should be looking into what the Catholic Church actually taught prior to Vatican II...not pointing fingers at those who have and claiming their views are “outmoded”. The problem is these same folks like the new, non-Catholic teaching.

[af_vet_1981]

Not a logical fallacy at all. Those that think it is ...

It seems to me that is yet another logical fallacy (Just Because Fallacy).

[piusv]

Of course it seems that way to you.

[af_vet_1981]

Not directed at anyone in particular, a proverb:

It is better to dwell in the wilderness, than with a contentious and an angry woman.

Proverbs, Catholic chapter twenty one, Protestant verse nine,
as authorized, but not authored, by King James

[Marchmain]

How on earth do you know what I believe about “doctrine” or “Vatican 2” or if I’m a “religionist”? I assure you I don’t fit in your simplified categories. Thankfully neither dies God.