Posted on 08/30/2018 1:50:31 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege
Bob Jones University is what most would call a fundamentalist school. No one, however, should think that it has low academic standards or is anti-cultural. The heavy emphasis on producing Shakespeares plays, the gallery of great religious art, as well as an exact replica of the Jerusalem Chamber of Westminster Abbey tell us otherwise.
One thing nearly all of us Protestants who have visited this beautiful and well-presented gallery cannot help noticing is the heavy preponderance, not only of Roman Catholic artists, but also of specifically Catholic themes.
When Bob Jones, Jr. was challenged with the question, Why do you have so many Catholic pictures?, his answer was, There is not a lot of good Protestant painting "
There are, however, great Protestant artists of Christian themes: Albrecht Durer, Holman Hunt, the Danish sculptor Thorvaldsen, to name a few. However, the greatest Protestant artist is surely Rembrandt van Ryn.
This Dutch genius left the world about 700 paintings, 300 etchings, and many drawings and sketches. His influence on 18th and 19th century art was great, and he is still considered one of the masters of the art world.
One of the truly Protestant features of Rembrandts religious works is that he used ordinary people, and frequently Jewish models from the Amsterdam ghetto, to pose for his Bible pictures.
Rembrandt, like Luther and Calvin,had great respect and fondness for Mary... Medieval, Renaissance, Baroque, but especially Counter-Reformation art had transformed the handmaiden of the Lord ancilla Domini of Luke 1 into the Queen of Heaven." -- Rembrandts portrayals of Mary are not glamorous or exalted, but humble, simple, and biblical.
(Excerpt) Read more at faithalone.org ...
Luther makes an unambiguous distinction between a theology of glory and the true theology of the cross. The theology of glory, he says, prefers works to suffering, glory to the cross, power to weakness, wisdom to foolishness, and in one word evil to good. But the theology of the cross knows that it is not enough for anybody nor does it help him that he recognizes God in his glory and majesty, unless he recognizes him in the abasement and ignominy of the cross. In analogy to this we may describe Rembrandts style as a painting of the cross.
"Paul in Prison"
The Holy Family with the Angels
The Return of the Prodigal Son
When the center of painting shifted to Paris in the 1700s, all subsequent styles, from Rococo to Romantic to pre-Raphaelite and beyond, were anti-Christian in philosophy. When photography and subsequent inventions such as motion pictures replaced painting as the main technology for capturing people, places, and events, there became little need for painting in general, except as deconstructionist abstraction. OTOH, there are a number of 1400s northern Renaissance painters (van Eyck, Christus, van der Weyden, etc.) whose works would be at home in any Lutheran church.
Ah...I think I did a decent job on the living room.
But this from 1982 is much used:
https://store.foi.org/p-465-the-bridge-1983-on.aspx
The 1982 picture is actually the one on the bottom (Full 28’’ poster $4.00 + shipping).
If one does not want to think of mortals "above that which is written," (1 Co. 4:6) and thus supports honoring Mary as the humble, pious holy, Spirit-filled women of God and devout mother of Jesus that she was/is, but does not venerate/worship the omnipotent ("by grace) The MARY of CATHOLICISM, and contends against such excess, then he can find himself charged with hating the "Mother of God" by cultic Catholics.
img alt="" src="http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/WMAN.GOYE.jpg" border="0" height="420" width="580"
(then add opening and closing brackets and a couple of blank lines)
Majoring in the minors.
I guess I missed in scripture where were supposed to focus on religious artwork when the world is going to hell in a handbasket.
And then things get usurped...
Which are quite UNlike the images conjured up in one's mind when they read the excesses claimed for her by the Roman Catholic Church.
The way it's written:
This change automatically scales the image to fit on any screen; whether cellphone, tablet or 19" monitor.
Use width=100% to fit image to full screen.
...in a long sermon preached in the Tabernacle on April 9, 1852, he made this announcement:
"Now hear it, O inhabitants of the earth, Jew and Gentile, saint and sinner. When our father Adam came into the Garden of Eden,
he came into it with a CELESTIAL BODY, and brought Eve, ONE OF HIS WIVES, with him. He helped to make and organize this world.
He is MICHAEL, the ARCHANGEL, the ANCIENT OF DAYS, about whom holy men have written and spoken.*
HE is our FATHER and our GOD, AND THE ONLY GOD WITH WHOM 'WE' HAVE TO DO... Every man upon the earth, professing Christians
or non-professing, must hear it and WILL KNOW IT SOONER OR LATER.... I could tell you much more about this;
but were I to tell you the whole truth, blasphemy would be nothing to it, in the estimation of the superstitious
and over righteous of mankind.... Jesus, our Elder Brother, was begotten in the flesh by the same character
that was in the Garden of Eden, and who is our Father in heaven."**
* Young, in a public discourse on October 23, 1853, declared that he rejected the story of Adam's creation as "baby stories my mother taught me when I was a child." But the Mormon Bible (2 Nephi ii. 18-22) tells the story of Adam's fall.** Journal of Discourses, VOL I, pp. 50, 51.
Title: The Story of the Mormons From the Date of their Origin to the Year 1901 Author: William Alexander Linn
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/2443/2443-h/2443-h.htm
Thanks. I think i will just upload it to Flickr and post it from there. But the image needs someone change it to modern models.
Some more oldies, by the grace of God (not under copyright as far as i know, and with color and or text added by me
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.