Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

10 Commandments of Progressive Christianity #1: Is Jesus Our Lord or Our Example?
Canon Fodder ^ | April 16, 2018 | Michael J. Kruger

Posted on 08/21/2018 9:56:22 AM PDT by Gamecock

Last week I announced a new series entitled “The 10 Commandments of Progressive Christianity,” based off a list offered by Richard Rohr. This list embodies the type of theological liberalism that was battled by Machen in the early 20th century and still abides today.

So, let’s jump right into the first commandment: “Jesus is a model for living more than an object of worship.”

In many ways, this is a fitting first commandment for progressive Christianity. When given the choice between worshiping Jesus (which requires that he is divine) and merely looking at Jesus as a good moral guide, liberals have always favored the latter.

Of course, one might object that this statement isn’t really rejecting the divinity of Jesus because of the phrase “more than.” Thus, it could be argued, liberals are quite happy to worship Jesus as divine, but just put the priority on his moral example.

But, I think that would be a naive way to take the text. While such a reading is possible, the entire history of liberal Christianity is against it. The first thing to be jettisoned by liberals is always the divinity of Jesus–and therefore the worship of him. Moreover, if Jesus really is our divine Lord, how could worshiping him be secondary? Why would Jesus as example be more important than Jesus as object of worship?

It seems, therefore, we ought not to read too much into the “more than” phrase. It is likely just a way to tone down and soften the implications of this first commandment.

What, then, do we make of Jesus as simply a moral example? Several problems arise here:

1. Jesus claimed to be more than a moral example

We can begin by acknowledging that Jesus was, of course, a moral example for his followers. Indeed, he often called his followers to do what he has done (e.g., John 13:15).

But, is Jesus merely a moral example? Or, to put it differently, do the Gospels present Jesus as just a wise sage; a Ghandi-like figure dropping helpful tips for practical living?

An honest reading of the Gospels shows the answer to this is a resounding no. Indeed, throughout these texts, Jesus is presented as more than a good teacher, but as the divine Lord of heaven and earth. Aside from the obvious Johannine passages that show this (e..g, John 1:1; 1:18 ; 8:58; 10:30), scholars have argued that Jesus’s divinity is also evident in the Synoptic Gospels.

As just one example, Michael Bird’s recent book, Jesus the Eternal Son, has argued that even Mark–often thought to be the Gospel which presents the most “human” Jesus–offers a decidedly high Christology. Jesus is the “Lord,” Yahweh visiting his people, the one who forgives sins, the ruler of the wind and the waves, and the judge of all the universe.

This reality led C.S. Lewis to offer his well-known quote on Jesus as just a good moral teacher:

“I am trying here to prevent anyone saying the really foolish thing that people often say about Him: I’m ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don’t accept his claim to be God. That is the one thing we must not say. A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic — on the level with the man who says he is a poached egg — or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice.”

2. Jesus’ followers worshiped him as Lord

While the first commandment of progressive Christianity seems quite hesitant about worshiping Jesus, that is not how the earliest Christians felt. Indeed, because Jesus was viewed as their Lord (prior point), they unreservedly devoted themselves to worshiping him.

And here’s the kicker: the earliest Christians did this while also being fully committed to monotheism. Even as Jews, they worshiped Jesus precisely because they believed he was the one true God of Israel.

And, we should also note that Jesus never rejected this worship. Nor did he seem sheepish, uncomfortable, or hesitant about it. He welcomed it without reservation.

A few examples of worship to Jesus:

Matt 2:11: Magi worship Jesus Matt 14:33 : Disciples worship Jesus on the boat Matt 28:9 Luke 24:52: Disciples worship Jesus after resurrection John 9:38: Man born blind worships Jesus Phil 2:10: Every knee will bow in worship of the Lord Jesus Heb 1:6: Author says the even the angels worship Jesus Revelation: Virtually the entire book is about the worship of Jesus

And this quick sampling does not even consider the numerous doxological declarations offered to Jesus, nor does it consider worship practices of the earliest Christians that show the type of devotion to Christ that is reserved for God alone. For more on the latter, see Larry Hurtado, One God One Lord: Early Christian Devotion and Ancient Christian Monotheism.

3. Jesus’ moral example is binding only if he is Lord.

While liberal Christians make much of Jesus’ moral example, what is missing in their system is why anyone should care. After all, if Jesus is just an ordinary man, then why would we think his particular moral code is any better than any other person’s? Why should we think his moral code matters at all?

Indeed, isn’t it the progressive Christian system that is always pushing back against people who make absolute moral claims? Morality is relative, we are told. Morality is ever-changing and culturally conditioned. There is no one true morality. Don’t push your morality on me.

So, why does Jesus get a pass? Why do these criticism not apply to him, if he is just another human being like us?

At this point, I suppose one could argue that Jesus has authority not because he is divine but because he is a prophet from God. But, how does one know he is a prophet from God? Scripture is the only way we know enough about Jesus to draw such a conclusion.

So, that just raises the question of what progressives think about Scripture. Many progressives don’t take Scripture as reliable and plainly reject its inspiration. If so, then how do they know Jesus is a prophet?

Other progressives might hang onto their view of the inspiration of Scripture. But, if they do that, then why don’t they accept the plain teaching of Scripture that Jesus is not just a prophet? Why don’t they accept the passages above that show Jesus as the object of worship?

Either way, the progressive Jesus-is-just-a-good-moral-teacher approach just doesn’t work.

On top of all of this, one might be confused by the progressive appeal to Jesus as a guide for morality when many progressives won’t, in fact, follow Jesus’ moral teaching. For example, are progressives willing to stand by Jesus’ plain teaching that marriage is between a man and a woman (e.g., Matt 19:5-6 ? Or that he is the only way of salvation?

If not, then why the eagerness to appeal to him as a moral teacher?

4. Christianity is not about moralism

Here is where we come to the most foundational problem with this first tenet. By removing the person of Jesus from the equation as an object of worship, it essentially makes Christianity a religion of moralism. What matters most, we are told, is not doctrine or theology, but behavior. Deeds over creeds.

But, this absolutely contrary to historic Christianity which is a religion of grace not a religion of merit. It’s not primarily about what we do, but what God has done in Christ.

Or, in the word of John: “In this is love, not that we have loved God but that he loved us and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins” (1 John 4:10).

Machen himself captured it well:

“Here is found the most fundamental difference between liberalism and Christianity–liberalism is altogether in the imperative mood, while Christianity begins with a triumphant indicative; liberalism appeals to man’s will, while Christianity announces, first, a gracious act of God” (47).

Conclusion

This first commandment of progressive Christianity is precisely what has been happening for the last century in the Western world (and much before that). It attempts to preserve Jesus’ morality while jettisoning Jesus’ divine identity.

But, in the end it simply doesn’t work. Jesus’ moral teaching only works when we keep his identity as the Lord. The two should never (and can never) be split apart.

“What God has joined together, let not man separate” (Matt 19:6).


TOPICS: Current Events; General Discusssion
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 08/21/2018 9:56:22 AM PDT by Gamecock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

If enough interest exists I will post the complete series over the next couple of weeks.


2 posted on 08/21/2018 9:57:00 AM PDT by Gamecock (In church today, we so often find we meet only the same old world, not Christ and His Kingdom. AS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Is Jesus Our Lord or Our Example?


Is a Mustang a Ford or a car?


3 posted on 08/21/2018 10:13:59 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Worship:

1 : to honor or reverence as a divine being or supernatural power

Jesus is to be worshiped, based on the information in all four gospels.


4 posted on 08/21/2018 10:16:56 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Jesus is my Lord and Savior!


5 posted on 08/21/2018 10:20:31 AM PDT by FES0844 (SGould the allow it. Hi call the shots. IÂ’m sure Laura would have stayed Oman wn of America has bee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FES0844

Jesus is my Lord and Savior!

___

Me too! Saved by the blood of the lamb!


6 posted on 08/21/2018 10:22:31 AM PDT by TiGuy22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
If enough interest exists I will post the complete series over the next couple of weeks.

I hope you do. It is always good to be aware of corruption in the Church.

I would also point out that even the angels of heavens worship Jesus (Hebrews 1:6).

7 posted on 08/21/2018 10:35:22 AM PDT by CommerceComet (Hillary: A unique blend of arrogance, incompetence, and corruption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Lord or Example?

Neither

He is the Christ who ascended to heaven

“He is Risen”


8 posted on 08/21/2018 11:36:16 AM PDT by WayneLusvardi (It's more complex than it might seem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WayneLusvardi

He is also Lord.

We are also supposed to live like Him, meaning he could be seen as our example.


9 posted on 08/21/2018 11:48:35 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
Jesus’ moral example is binding only if he is Lord.

Excellent.....

10 posted on 08/21/2018 12:35:26 PM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
The first thing to be jettisoned by liberals is always the divinity of Jesus

No it isn't. It's always Genesis 1-11, followed by the rest of the Hebrew Bible, that get the heave-ho first.

The churches are full of people who believe all the supernatural dogmas of the "new testament" but who smile at the naivete of people who read those chapters as actual history. Once this is done, there is no excuse to continue to believe in alleged "miracles," each of which is just as "impossible" as those in the TaNa"KH. And it isn't just the liberals who do this.

There are also huge numbers of people who believe that G-d didn't really ask Israel to exterminate anyone, because in light of the "new testament," "we now know" that G-d would never do something so "mean."

"New testament" liberalism is a most just punishment for "conservative" and "orthodox" TaNa"KH liberalism.

11 posted on 08/21/2018 1:15:32 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator ("Conservatism" without G-d is just another form of Communism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Go for it. My experience with Kruger is that he is a scholar and teacher with impeccable credentials.


12 posted on 08/21/2018 2:32:53 PM PDT by enotheisen (CMSGT USAF Ret)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

How are those mutually exclusive?

Our Lord is our Exemplar.


13 posted on 08/22/2018 12:07:37 AM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Is a Mustang a Ford or a car?


It was a horse long before it was a ford or a car.


14 posted on 08/22/2018 8:44:37 AM PDT by ravenwolf (Left lane drivers and tailgaters have the smallest brains in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

I owned a 73 mustang as my first car in the late 80’s.. Definitely a Ford. Last Ford I owned. I hadn’t thought about there being a strict distinction between Ford and car before, but now that you mention it, I think you’re right.


15 posted on 08/22/2018 9:05:25 AM PDT by Hieronymus ((It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G. K. Chesterton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson