Credibly accused? Or simply accused?
I don't know a single person who got through Catholic schools in the 1960s or 1970s who did not have a nun whack them across the fingers with a ruler. Today, even that would be called abuse.
I would suggest that if two or more accuse the same man, it should be looked into with zeal.
That would be the Christian thing to do.
They've about bled the Catholic Church in this country dry, they'll start in on all other Christians soon enough. It'll be interesting to see whether people screaming about Catholics accept the same sort of proof for claims against non-Catholic schools and pastors as they're eagerly eating up now. Proof that almost all comes from the very same sort of democrat scum that 80% of Evangelicals say lie about everything else, by the way.
All in all, an interesting study in the human preference for things that fit their preconceptions and the ease with which they adopt as a preconception whatever the media formerly known as mainstream have pumped out for decades.
"The report cites 301 priests, clergy and lay teachers with credible allegations against them.
There are 99 in the Diocese of Pittsburgh alone.
Of those 99, a group of four groomed and violently sexually assaulted young boys, said Shapiro.
“One boy was forced to stand on a bed in a rectory, strip naked and pose as Christ on the cross
for the priests. They took photos of their victim, adding them to a collection of child pornography
which they produced and shared on church grounds,” Shapiro said.
Shapiro said the priests would mark their victims by giving them gifts.
“To make it easier to target their victims, the priests gave their favored boys gifts –
gold crosses to wear as necklaces. The crosses were markings of which boys had
been groomed for abuse,” Shapiro said.