To: DuncanWaring
I’m under the understanding that when the pope speaks on biblical matters he’s correct.
18 posted on
03/29/2018 7:58:37 AM PDT by
SkyDancer
( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
To: SkyDancer
Nope.
Only when he formally says “This is Infallible”.
This guy’s not even pope.
False-prophet forerunner of the Antichrist, perhaps.
21 posted on
03/29/2018 8:00:19 AM PDT by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: SkyDancer
Yes. Except when he’s a heretic.
36 posted on
03/29/2018 8:14:02 AM PDT by
WayneS
(An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill.)
To: SkyDancer
Im under the understanding that when the pope speaks on biblical matters hes correct. Babbling to a journalist isn't formal teaching. He has attempt to teach (a) definitively and (b) to the whole church for infallibility to come into play.
69 posted on
03/29/2018 8:47:04 AM PDT by
Campion
(Halten Sie sich unbedingt an die Lehre! [Hold yourself absolutely to the Teaching! -- BXVI])
To: SkyDancer
Your understanding is incorrect. We trust, on the basis of Christ's promises, that the Pope will never be able to effectively pull the whole Church into error on the basis of obedience to papal "doctrine." That is, it has to be a highly formal, official, "ex cathedra" statement.
This "ex cathedra" condition has been invoked only once since the doctrine of infallibility was defined. The following 2 minute YouTube --- which is actually funny, in a grim but wacky way --- should help clarify this.
PAPAL INFALLIBILITY EXPLAINED IN TWO MINUTES
87 posted on
03/29/2018 9:39:05 AM PDT by
Mrs. Don-o
(Satan: the Father of Lies, and a murderer from the beginning.)
To: SkyDancer
Popes correct.
YES.
Papal infallibility...er something.
102 posted on
03/29/2018 11:08:38 AM PDT by
Big Red Badger
(UNSCANABLE in an IDIOCRACY!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson