Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ealgeone

“Leo made the case already. You just refuse to see it. That’s a bad historian that doesn’t understand history.”

Leo X NEVER authorized the selling of indulgences. There’s not even one document from his pontifical office that says he did. The preaching of indulgences is not the selling of indulgences and the selling of indulgences was forbidden by canon law.

I understand history and researched this in great detail years ago. You have never read a single book on the subject. You’re never read a single scholarly article on the subject. All you have ever done is follow your programming like a good little drone. You’re doing it now.


55 posted on 10/14/2017 7:11:16 AM PDT by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: vladimir998
You send money I give an indulgence. I'll grant an indulgence if you give money. It's a sale no matter how you try to slice it. You're trying to argue semantics to justify your position. Very typical or Roman Catholicism to have to redefine words. But then again with you the Rules do apply.

You have no idea of my academic background.

I've asked for you to substantiate yours previously but you refuse.

56 posted on 10/14/2017 7:15:50 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson