“You keep believing that as a good catholic.”
I’m a historian. You can’t show me any evidence against what I said. I already know that none has ever been found.
“Denial must be a wonderful thing.”
You would have to tell me. I just deal with reality. This is why you won’t post any evidence of the Catholic Church ever once authorizing the sale of indulgences - because none exists.
“History however understands what Leo did.”
Well, I’m a historian and what you’re saying is simply untrue. I think you might know it’s untrue as well and that’s probably why you don’t even attempt to make a case. But you have to stick to your programming.
“To Protestantism False Witness is the principle of propagation.” (John Henry Newman, Lecture 4. True Testimony Insufficient for the Protestant View)
Leo made the case already. You just refuse to see it. That’s a bad historian that doesn’t understand history.