piusv,
Perhaps you need to read more closely. Mrs. Don-O said the following:
“As an RCIA teacher I have been very favorably impressed by the Ratzinger Catechism’s fidelity to Scripture and Tradition. The footnotes alone, I think, provide enough substance to challenge the skeptic and nourish the intellectually honest.”
Did you see that? CATECHISM. FOOTNOTES.
Yet you replied with, “Well, if you believe Vatican II is “traditional”, then there’s really nothing I could say to convince you otherwise.”
Mrs. Don-O said that the CATECHISM is faithful to Scripture and Tradition. And she said that the FOOTNOTES (of that CATECHISM) are worthwhile. You, instead, talked about Vatican II.
Vatican II is not the CCC. The CCC is not Vatican II. One is a Church council. The other is a catechism.
No, I don’t need to read more closely. The footnotes in JPII’s Catechism include many footnotes from the documents of the Vatican II Council. Hence, my mention of the Vatican II Council.