Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Agape Love
Grace to You.org ^ | 1997 | John MacArthur, Grace Community Church

Posted on 07/27/2017 4:10:09 PM PDT by metmom

“. . . And in your brotherly kindness, Christian love” (2 Peter 1:7).

Sacrificial love proves genuine faith.

Classical Greek had three common terms for love. As we saw yesterday, phileo (philadelphia) is the love of give and take, best expressed in friendship. Eros is the love that takes—one loves another strictly for what he or she can get out of that person. It is typical of the world’s sexual and lustful desires, which are always bent toward self-gratification. Agape is the love that gives. It is completely unselfish, with no taking involved. This is the highest form of love, which all the other virtues in 2 Peter 1 ultimately lead to. It seeks another’s supreme good, no matter what the cost. Agape was exemplified perfectly by Jesus’ sacrifice on our behalf.

But what does this highest type of love look like? A brief survey of the one anothers in the New Testament gives an excellent picture. We are commanded to:

Edify one another (Rom. 14:19). “Serve one another” (Gal. 5:13). “Bear one another’s burdens” (Gal. 6:2). Submit to one another (Eph. 5:21). Forgive one another (Col. 3:13). Instruct one another (Col. 3:16). “Comfort one another” (1 Thess. 4:18). Rebuke one another (Titus 1:13). Encourage one another to do good (Heb. 10:24-25). Confess our sins to one another (James 5:16). “Pray for one another” (James 5:16). “Be hospitable to one another” (1 Peter 4:9-10).

The Lord Jesus Christ was involved with individuals. He was a true friend who caringly, lovingly, and sensitively interacted with feeble, needy, and unimportant people and made them eternally important.

Nevertheless we still find people spiritualizing love into a meaningless term. “I love so-and-so in the Lord” really means, “He irks me, but I guess I have to love him if he’s a believer.” Don’t let yourself say that. Instead, display genuine love.

Suggestions for Prayer

Thank God that Christ showed agape love toward you on the cross.

For Further Study

Memorize one of the verses in the list of one anothers, and apply it at every appropriate opportunity.


TOPICS: Evangelical Christian; General Discusssion; Theology; Worship
KEYWORDS: gty

1 posted on 07/27/2017 4:10:09 PM PDT by metmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: metmom

It is possible to properly define agape and elevate it without denigrating eros. In the original Greek, eros was neither lustful nor selfish. It was simply the love between a man and a woman. God created the husband-wife relationship to be a loving, respectful union. It is a real-life example of eros.

The point being that yes, agape is the highest form of love, but there’s nothing dirty or inately base about eros. God created male and female, and the ideal love a married couple share is a blessed thing.


2 posted on 07/27/2017 4:28:08 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic wotk using Inernet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy; bkaycee; boatbums; CynicalBear; daniel1212; dragonblustar; Dutchboy88; ealgeone; ...

Studying God’s Word ping


3 posted on 07/27/2017 5:24:35 PM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

Good points.

It is interesting how that there is always that subtle implication that sex is somehow wrong or sinful.

I’ve seen it stated that the lust etc is wrong but marriage is the only context in which sexual activity is OK, thereby implying the sex and desire is wrong aspect instead of sex is good but wrong outside of marriage.

It sends a different message.


4 posted on 07/27/2017 5:33:51 PM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: metmom

I think the confusion arises between the similarity of the English word, ‘erotic,’ to the Greek word, ‘eros.’ Certainly they’re related, but they’re very far from synonyms. Erotica inherently involves lust, but eros doesn’t.

To see a good depiction of eros, one needs go no further than The Song of Solomon. Yes, it was written in Hebrew, and the word ‘eros,’ never occurs in it. Yet it’s a beautiful and accurate depiction of the Greek concept of eros. *And* it’s God’s imprimatur on that type of love—a celebration of it.

Agape is certainly higher and more eternal. But in this life, there’s nothing wrong with eros in its proper place.


5 posted on 07/27/2017 5:55:44 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic wotk using Inernet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

Selah


6 posted on 07/28/2017 8:38:37 AM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensational perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson