Posted on 07/13/2017 11:02:45 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
The man who leads the largest Roman Catholic Church in America is advocating that the church allow married men to become priests, and plans to spend his retirement ministering among the poorest of the poor.
Monsignor John McSweeney, 75, who is originally from New York, is concluding 43 years of ministry in Charlotte, North Carolina, where he has most recently served as priest at St. Matthew in Ballantyne, an affluent suburb of the state's most populous city.
St. Matthew Catholic Church is the largest Roman Catholic parish in the United States which boasts of over 10,000 families, according to The Charlotte Observer Sunday.
Much like Pope Francis, McSweeney said he desires a church that is more oriented toward hospitality and less about judgment. Charlotte, which reportedly has a burgeoning population of Roman Catholics, faces a shortage of priests in their diocese. And to address this, McSweeney said he favors the Church allowing priests to be married, mentioning that he has been around many Protestant pastors who are married and "doing great work."
"And many men I was in the (Catholic) seminary with would be great priests today except for one thing," McSweeney said. That one thing is their desire to be married.
For the first 1,000 years of Catholicism, celibacy for priests was optional. In March, Pope Francis expressed openness to the idea.
"In our history, we would have men in training in different seminaries so we'd get a broader aspect of the church," he said.
"And I think that's what should be done now. Not just one place."
In the fall of 2009, Pope Benedict invited disenchanted Anglicans to come into the Roman Catholic Church, and allowed for married Anglican priests who converted to remain in the clergy.
McSweeney is "very concerned," however, about a resurgence of younger priests who are very conservative who dislike the Vatican II reforms in the Catholic Church.
Also called the Second Vatican Council, this council occurred in the 1960s where the Roman Church adopted notable changes in the way ministry is conducted. Vatican II invited lay people to minister more actively in the liturgy, and masses were increasingly celebrated in native languages of people, not just Latin.
Yet lay ministers who are women, are not being allowed, for instance, to help serve Communion. Altar boys are permitted, but not altar girls.
These young conservative priests, McSweeney explained, "are trying to reform the reform ... I don't endorse what they're doing to God's people."
When it comes to ordaining women as priests, as several Protestant denominations have done for decades, McSweeney said he "won't go there." Pope Francis and other recent popes have stated that change will never occur.
"I've had the privilege of being in many different roles in ministry ... But I think I need now to experience [poverty]," McSweeney said, who intends to spend the years of his retirement in a place like Haiti or Jamaica, ministering among some of the most destitute people on earth.
"I'm going to try to walk in the sandals of the Lord," McSweeney said.
"I have a little motto: 'You never say no to Jesus.' And he keeps talking to me."
McSweeney will preach his farewell sermon at St. Matthew on Sunday.
Apparently about 1.2 billion who side with Catholicism over Scripture.
Classic non-sequitur. No one would expect you to go to dermatologist if you need brain surgery. Given the choice of seeing a licensed person in interpersonal relationships and who also is married to me has a better understanding of the problems than someone who has never been married. I believe it's a perspective that is deepened if experienced.
Sorry for the delayed reply, I got called away for an extended period.
Two things - if this only refers to a Bishop, then I would say that we are discussing priests. I guess you could say that to become a Bishop you must first become a priest.
Second, I was only rendering my opinion based on what I have personally seen. Whether Scripture indicates marriage is permissible or not for a priest was not my consideration.
You’re trying to turn this into something it’s not.
My opinion is that priests should not marry. And I indicated why not.
Obviously there are those who agree and those who disagree.
Please see #44.
Please refer to #44.
Not sure if I’m answering your question clearly. Maybe because I would have to meditate upon it for a while.
But it seems to me, on the surface at least, that this is saying if a man cannot keep his own house in order, how can he be expected (trusted?) to run the Church properly.
By ‘house’, I assume they mean an abode; domicile, correct? But could it also mean ‘house’ in a metaphorical sense, as in ‘keeping your affairs in order’ (as opposed to a physical house)?
I don’t know the answer. Not at the moment anyway.
Disagree again.
You are now presenting a different argument. You originally said a priest should be married to better understand a married couple’s problems. You did not say that a married couple should go to a licensed marriage counselor.
But again, not all marriage counselors have to be married to be educated, licensed and properly formed to provide advice in their area of expertise. Likewise, priests are trained to do the same. They don’t have to be married to provide spiritual advice on marital problems.
Well the Eastern Rite Catholics allow for married priests. Kid you not.
There is scripture passages reffering to married clergy.
Bookmark
Agree.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.