Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/28/2017 6:48:40 PM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Morgana

Abortion advocates want everyone to be stained.


2 posted on 06/28/2017 6:58:12 PM PDT by Architect of Avalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

So much for “choice”. /s


3 posted on 06/28/2017 7:08:49 PM PDT by ealgeone (int)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

The Archbishop of St. Louis is Robert Carlson. He’s totally orthodox and fearless. He won’t put up with this for a second.


4 posted on 06/28/2017 7:12:00 PM PDT by BlessedBeGod (To restore all things in Christ~~Appeasing evil is cowardice~~Francis is temporary. Hell is forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

**Missouri Right to Life is supporting the legislation, warning that unless HB 174 becomes a reality, the state is on track to “force churches and others to be complicit in the profound evil of abortion.” **

Prayers for the pro-lifers in Missouri.


5 posted on 06/28/2017 7:51:55 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Free speech is free speech is free speech; the constitution was explicit that this is protected. Any ordinance forbidding free speech is unconstitutional and it takes absolutely no court to verify that, it just takes a people willing to enjoy their natural rights.

Sue us, fine us, and pay massive legal bills as we fight tooth and nail every inch of the way to protect our god given rights and freedoms.

It is a government OF the people, FOR the people, not OVER the people.


6 posted on 06/28/2017 7:54:52 PM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Misleading headline.

The law has not been passed yet.


7 posted on 06/28/2017 7:57:27 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s ("If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

What the heck is this? Since when ideology was to be state sponsored by law and funds?


8 posted on 06/28/2017 8:55:22 PM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucifiedc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana; All
Thank you for referencing that article Morgana. As usual, please note that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.

Noting

What’s worse? State / city officials who make laws that abridge constitutionally enumerated rights regardless that such laws are prohibited by Section 1 of the 14th Amendment (14A), or citizens who cannot claim 14A protections because they either may not have been taught that amendement, or their legal council may have been indoctrinated not to claim it?

”14th Amendment, Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

Patriots who value 1st Amendment-protected religious expression should note that Acts 22:25-29 indicates that Paul claimed his protections as a Roman citizen to save himself from being flogged.

9 posted on 06/28/2017 10:15:47 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson