Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: boatbums

I need to clarify my question.

What does “the oral transmission of God’s word” mean?

You say this: “there was a long time where oral transmission of God’s word was there but eventually it was written down”.

I am not sure how that relates to this topic.


7 posted on 06/18/2017 11:42:20 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: ifinnegan; boatbums

Well, considering some Catholics seem to believe that simply speaking something translates into “tradition”, it does relate.

oral transmission is not by default automatically tradition.


13 posted on 06/19/2017 4:56:03 AM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan

**What does “the oral transmission of God’s word” mean?**

This is what Holy Tradition is all about.

There were no books or Bibles at that time and people had a great talent for memorizing.

Thus, we have the end of John’s Gospel, where he states that not everything said by Jesus can be written down — consider the lack of Papyrus to make scrolls, for example.


25 posted on 06/19/2017 9:11:12 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan
What does “the oral transmission of God’s word” mean? You say this: “there was a long time where oral transmission of God’s word was there but eventually it was written down”. I am not sure how that relates to this topic.

When we talk about the New Testament Scripture, for example, we know that there was at least a decade or two between when Jesus ascended up to heaven and the first "gospel" books were written down. The teachings that Jesus relayed while He was here were passed down verbally/orally through believers to those who wanted to know what Jesus said. Gradually, the entire New Testament was completed with the writings of the Apostles and their disciples who wrote as they were led along by the Holy Spirit.

The same thing happened in the time before Christ. The history of creation, the establishment of the Jewish nation through Abraham, Isaac and Jacob - all was passed along by oral tradition (tradition is "teachings") until the time Moses was tasked with writing it down in the Pentateuch (the first five books of the OT). There were writings from the prophets of the Lord as He directed them, as well.

Catholicism, as well as some others, teach that there was much revealed truth that was passed down orally that never did get written down. They call this "Sacred Tradition". The problem is that they don't really have any proof that what they say was orally passed down from the Apostles ever actually came FROM an Apostle. I hold to the contention that the Holy Spirit ensured that everything we needed to know for our salvation, our walk in the faith, our responsibilities towards God and each other, and His plans for our world WAS written down in Sacred Scripture. Because it is the Divinely-inspired word of God, it stands as THE authority over anything man has devised. The church is not an authority over Scripture but is its servant expected to be obedient to what God tells us.

27 posted on 06/19/2017 6:30:41 PM PDT by boatbums (Authority has a way of descending to certitude, and certitude begets hubris.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson