Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: boatbums
You disappoint me, boatbums. That's a fairly silly list.

  1. That's not a difference.
  2. Hardly. The Pope is infallible when teaching definitively to the whole church a doctrine concerning faith or morals. That's a fairly restrictive circumstance. Both Catholics and Orthodox believe that properly constituted Ecumenical Councils teach infallibly.
  3. The Orthodox don't believe in original sin in the Western sense. It would be more correct to assert that the Orthodox think that Mary, and everyone else, is free from original sin, at least in the way that the West understands it.
  4. A difference in discipline. There are some Catholic priests, even in the West, who are married at ordination. Note that only celibate men become bishops in Orthodoxy.
  5. Has the writer set foot in a Catholic church at any time since about 1964?
  6. Protestants call both "idolatry".
  7. No, infallibly taught doctrines cannot be altered in either faith.
  8. The "Stations of the Cross" is a devotional meditation based on Scripture, not a "concept". Of course the East has a different set of devotions. "Purgatory" is a concept from Latin theology; the Greeks have a similar concept called "spiritual toll houses". Both faiths teach prayer for the dead.
As I say, a very weak list. It doesn't touch on the filioque, for example ... but Protestants generally agree with the Catholic position on that, not the Orthodox.
78 posted on 04/11/2017 6:25:40 PM PDT by Campion (Halten Sie sich unbedingt an die Lehre!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: Campion
And you disappoint me Campion. That "silly" list is simply a summary of some of the differences - though I said that, didn't I?

Like I also said, these differences (whatever they may ALL be) were enough to cause a split nearly a thousand years ago that has never been rectified. Being that I am not a Greek/Eastern Orthodox member, it's not my place to teach you all about that. From the reading that I have done, I can say that they sound MORE orthodox than Roman Catholicism. They sound like they have remained MORE faithful to the ancient Christian faith than the RCC, though I have no desire to join up with them.

If you are interested, here are a few more links that describe the differences:

http://www.ocf.org/OrthodoxPage/reading/ortho_cath.html

http://christianityinview.com/comparison.html

https://oca.org/questions/romancatholicism

80 posted on 04/11/2017 7:23:30 PM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: Campion; boatbums
You disappoint me, boatbums. That's a fairly silly list.

Then one can conclude that both the EO and the Romans are being silly in allowing petty little differences to put them in schism for a thousand years or more.

131 posted on 04/13/2017 3:53:44 AM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: Campion
It doesn't touch on the filioque, for example

2 Timothy 2:14
Remind others about these things, and warn them before God not to argue over words.

159 posted on 04/13/2017 5:15:16 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson