[af_vet_1981]

It is included in the excerpt you quoted from the CNA article? Did you not read it before you posted it?

Yes, of course I read it; I read it in context and saw how absurd the lifesite news propaganda hit piece was. So, even though I would agree with the position, hit piece propaganda really turns me off.

Am I against adultery ? Yes
Was the woman taken in the very act of adultery ? Yes
Am I going to back the religious men with stones ? Not a chance

[ebb tide]

You’re dodging now.

The whole article is about cohabitation and it, and other sources both you and I have sourced, correctly quoted Francis as stating:

“I’ve seen a lot of fidelity in these cohabitations, and I am sure that this is a real marriage, they have the grace of a real marriage because of their fidelity, but there are local superstitions, etc.”

I’m sorry you continue to ignore that.

[ebb tide]

Am I against adultery ? Yes

Are you against sexually active cohabitation? Yes or No.

Do you think a "lot of" cohabititating couples have "real marriage(s), they have the grace of a real marriage because of their fidelity" as Bergoglio thinks? Yes or No?

[piusv]

I read it in context and saw how absurd the lifesite news propaganda hit piece was.

Isn't Lifesite News a Catholic website? Are the Catholic websites now being accused of fake news/propaganda about Francis?