Posted on 02/27/2017 1:49:07 AM PST by BlessedBeGod
Homily by Archbishop Thomas Wenski at Mass with seminarians and alumni at St. Vincent de Paul Regional Seminary. Friday, Feb. 24, 2017.
Many of our alumni will remember Father Manny Fidalgo he taught at both seminaries. Once at St. John Vianney, when he was the celebrant of the Mass, this same gospel weve just heard was read. After reading the gospel, he looked out at the seminarians and said: Since this hasnt anything to do with us, lets just stand up for the Creed.
Jesus words on marriage are hard sayings; and, so were his words on the Eucharist, the bread I shall give is my flesh. Given the ongoing debate some would just say, confusion over the content and context of Amoris Laetitia, -especially chapter 8 Christs teachings on marriage and Eucharist remain hard sayings, dont they?
But, following Fr. Fidalgos lead, Im not going to get into the current debates about Amoris Laetitia. But, let me just say, Amoris Laetitia still needs to be unpacked to be fully understood and appreciated; but, since Pope Francis himself said that it does not change Church teachings on Marriage, it should not be interpreted as if it does. Apostolic Exhortations do not change doctrine. Canon Law also is not changed by the Exhortation. For example, Pope Francis mentions that neither the Synod nor this Exhortation could be expected to provide a new set of general rules What is possible is simply a renewed encouragement to undertake a responsible personal and pastoral discernment of particular cases Priests have the duty to accompany (the divorced and remarried) in helping them to understand their situation according to the teaching of the Church and the guidelines of the bishop.
Thus, the best way to understand this document is to see it in continuity with previous Church documents on the same topic. To grasp what Amoris Laetitia proposes, read the text and read the text in context and dont just read commentary.
Back to tonights gospel reading even though we are not planning on being married, the reading does give us the opportunity to ask ourselves: what do we say to people and how do we say it when we are obliged to preach on some of these hard sayings of the gospel? Pope Francis reminds us in Amoris Laetitia, moral laws are not stones to be thrown at a persons life.
As Ministers of Gods Word, we are to preach as they say in Haitian Creole san wete, san mete without subtracting from or adding anything to Gods Word. The Christ that is the answer to the longings of the human heart the Christ that is found in the gospels is much different from the image of Christ that prevails in our culture today. The popular image of Jesus today is of a Jesus who demands nothing, who never scolds, who accepts everyone and everything a Jesus who no longer does anything but affirm us.
Pope Benedict, when he was still Cardinal Ratzinger, wrote: The Jesus that makes everything okay for everybody is a phantom, a dream, and not a real figure. The Jesus we meet in the Gospel who is the same yesterday, today and forever is demanding and bold. And, therefore, he is not always convenient for us in his boldness and in his demands. And, the Church, if she is to be the effective presence of Christ in the world today, cannot be ashamed or afraid of the very real demands of discipleship that Jesus boldly makes on those who would be his followers. Remember John the Baptist lost his head for defending the truth about marriage.
Jesus words in todays gospel should not be seen as merely quaint and outdated. If marriage is what Jesus says it is, then we can understand why failed marriages bring such pain to couples, their families and their communities. Jesus special concern for children should remind us that they are often victimized when their parents divorce. Individualism, narcissism, materialism, consumerism a whole bunch of isms work against the faith in our contemporary world. And the Church mercifully and pastorally - proposes the Joy of Love in contrast to our cultures tendencies to treat commitment and love as conditional.
Preaching is also a form of pastoral care. In preaching, we wield the sword of the Word. It is a double-edged sword, the Letter to Hebrews tells us. Its supposed to be able to penetrate to the heart because the purpose of preaching is to bring about a change of heart. On the first Pentecost the people responded to Peters preaching as we read in the Acts of the Apostles: Now when they heard this, they were cut to the heart cut to the heart but not scarred. Unfortunately and I know this from the letters I get -a few preachers often do scar people whether intentionally or unintentionally.
And, if you live by the sword, you can die by the sword. Too often those who wield the Bible as a weapon to point out another persons flaws often convict themselves. As St. Paul writes in Romans 2: 21-22: you who teach another, are you failing to teach yourself? You who preach against stealing, do you steal? You who forbid adultery, do you commit adultery? You who detest idols, do you rob temples? Remember, when you point an accusatory finger at someone, there are three others pointed back at you.
They say that politics is a contact sport. Today in America, political discourse is filled with shrill polemics that generate much heat but little light. Such divisive partisanship perhaps is the way of the world; but it cannot be the way of the Church, for the way of the Church must be, as St. Paul told the contentious Corinthians, a more excellent way, the way of love (cf. 1 Cor 12:31-13:13). Yet, too often we see how those who insist on their own views can easily become consumed with a bitter zeal.
You can see this bitter zeal in those who point out peoples' faults not so much to help them but to humiliate them, to put them down.
Pope St. Pius X, who served at the beginning of the 20th century, began his pontificate under the motto of Restoring all things to Christ. One can draw many parallels between his inaugural encyclical, E Supremi, and Pope Francis apostolic exhortation, Evangelii Gaudium (The Joy of the Gospel). Both were concerned with the Gospel not being presented as an oppressive lists of donts but rather as it truly is: good news, a wonderful, joyful invitation to mankind to find in Jesus Christ the authentic vision of life and the path to true freedom.
Our religion does have its share of rules and regulations, and some are less important than others. Every society has its rules that's the only way you can have people live and work together. But the rules and regulations are means to an end rather than the end itself. When we confuse "ends" and "means" we can fall into the error of the Pharisees and Scribes we can fall into legalism, and we can fall into the type of religious hypocrisy that Jesus criticized in very strong terms. Again, the rules and regulations of our religion are means to an end. They are means to lead us to friendship with Jesus; they are not supposed to become a substitute for that relationship with Jesus.
And so, St. Pius X wrote: that Christ may be formed in all, be it remembered that no means is more efficacious than charity. He then added:
it is vain to hope to attract souls to God by a bitter zeal. On the contrary, harm is done more often than good by taunting men harshly with their faults, and reproving their vices with asperity. No true reform or revitalization of Church life has ever been the fruit of a bitter zeal.
Another liar, toady, and coward. And he dares to quote St. Paul, Pope St. Pius X, and Benedict XVI to try to back up Amoris Laetitia's heresy.
In your opinion, where does he lie here?
This is a good example:
"But, let me just say, Amoris Laetitia still needs to be unpacked to be fully understood and appreciated; but, since Pope Francis himself said that it does not change Church teachings on Marriage, it should not be interpreted as if it does. Apostolic Exhortations do not change doctrine. Canon Law also is not changed by the Exhortation. For example, Pope Francis mentions that
neither the Synod nor this Exhortation could be expected to provide a new set of general rules
What is possible is simply a renewed encouragement to undertake a responsible personal and pastoral discernment of particular cases
Priests have the duty to accompany (the divorced and remarried) in helping them to understand their situation according to the teaching of the Church and the guidelines of the bishop.
Of course it changes Church teachings. That's the whole problem with it. And then he goes on trying to convince the seminarians that it doesn't change Church teachings by using weasel words.
I found this homily to be rather encouraging.
I think a reader can infer that Wenski is making it clear that there is no change in doctrine and those who use AL to promote schism and heresy...
including perhaps Francis himself... are in the wrong.
I have a hard time seeing the difference between what he said and what many have said about Vatican II (and how it has been “interpreted”).
I reject the ludicrous assertion that rigid legalism and heartless adherence to “rules” is at all a problem in our Church or our society.
Anyone who says they are is either an idiot or a liar.
**Apostolic Exhortations do not change doctrine. Canon Law also is not changed by the Exhortation.**
Amen!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.