Look up “reductio ad absurdum” in any Logic textbook.
This is not a subjective matter.
If you wish to brand yourself as intellectually dishonest, just keep claiming that a perfectly valid form of argument is “in the eye of the beholder.”
It has no place in a religious discussion where we are given clear instructions and examples of what our actions should be.
Acts 4:25 Who by the mouth of thy servant David hast said, Why did the heathen rage, and the people imagine vain things?