Posted on 10/16/2016 9:10:07 PM PDT by Salvation
KEYWORDS: catholic; lk12; ordinarytime; prayer; saints;
Please FReepmail me to get on/off the Alleluia Ping List.
From: Ephesians 2:1-10
Salvation As a Free Gift
*********************************************************************************************
Commentary:
1-10. St Paul moves on to consider those who make up the Church — Jews and
Gentiles. Despite the sinful situation in which both found themselves (vv. 2-3),
God in is great mercy (vv. 4-5) has acted on them and made them to be like
Christ, now victorious and seated in heaven (vv. 6-7); this he has done through
the unmerited gift of faith (vv. 8-10).
1-2. “You”: he is referring to Christians of Gentile origin, in contrast with “we”
(v. 3), Christians of Jewish background.
Prior to his conversion to Christ a pagan was, as it were, en route to death, that
is, liable to condemnation on account of sin—both original sin and sin caused by
worldly behavior, that is, actions opposed to God. That is what the Apostle
means here by “this world”—a world which is under the power of the devil (cf. note
on Jn 1:10). The description of the devil as “prince of the power of the air” reflects
the notion, widely held in ancient times, that demons dwelt in the earth’s atmos-
phere, from where they exercised a baneful influence over mankind (cf. Mt 12:24;
Jn 12:31). St Paul uses the language of his time without taking on board the cos-
mology it implies. He is teaching theology, and the devil he identifies as the one
who is at work in the “sons of disobedience”, “the rebels”—an apposite descrip-
tion, for Satan is characterized by his rebellion against God, and his influence on
men leads them into rebellion to seek their fulfillment in created things or in
things of their own fashioning, thereby refusing to give God his primary place. St
Paul could see this happening in the pagan world around him (cf. Rom 1:18-23);
and in fact it happens in all periods of history when man refuses to recognize
God: “Although set by God in a state of rectitude, man, enticed by the evil one,
abused his freedom at the very start of history. He lifted himself up against God,
and sought to attain his goal apart from him. Although they had known God, they
did not glorify him as God, but their senseless hearts were darkened, and they
served the creature rather than the Creator (cf. Rom 1:21-25) [...] Often refusing
to acknowledge God as his source, man has also upset the relationship which
should link him to his last end; and at the same time he has broken the right or-
der that should reign within himself as well as between himself and other men
and all the rest of creation” (Vatican II, “Gaudium Et Spes”, 13).
3. Before the coming of Christ, those who were Jews were likewise guilty of sin
and merited denunciation. St Paul has already discussed this in his Letter to the
Romans (cf. Rom 2:1 - 3:10); now he sketches out the same ideas, to empha-
size that everyone, Jew and Gentile alike, obtains salvation through Christ (v. 5).
The Jews know the true God and have the benefits of the Law; therefore, their
sinfulness derives not so much from the seductions of the world and the devil as
from human passion. The “desires of the body and mind” does not refer simply
to the weakness of human nature (cf. Jn 1:14) or lustful desires but to all the de-
sires and appetites of human nature when it does not obey God—to man’s tenden-
cy to do whatever he wants, even when he knows that it conflicts with God’s law
(cf. Rom 7:5; 2 Cor 7:1; Col 2:13). The Jews also were subject to this power of
the flesh, for they were “children of wrath, like the rest of mankind”.
“Children of wrath”: this expression of man’s state of enmity towards God; it does
not imply that God sees man as his enemy but that by sinning man incurs divine
punishment. It has this effect for Jews and Gentiles alike.
In this verse the Apostle is referring to the behavior of both Jews and Gentiles;
thus, the words “by nature” do not exactly mean the weakness of human nature
as such but rather refer to the fact that man, if left to his own devices, cannot
avoid sin and therefore cannot escape God’s wrath. St John Chrysostom, St Je-
rome and other Fathers read “by nature” as opposed to “by grace”. This would
mean that “by nature” refers to human existence considered on its own, that is,
unaided by grace—life in a state of sin, which would mean it merited God’s wrath.
But the reason why this is so is that human nature has been debilitated by origi-
nal sin; some Fathers in fact, including St Augustine, read this passage as a
recognition of the fact of original sin. Certainly St Paul is at least implying that
there is such a thing as original sin, as St Thomas Aquinas explains: “He says
that we were (children of wrath) ‘by nature’, that is, by our natural origin, but not
meaning nature as such, for (sheer) nature is good and comes from God: he is
referring to nature in its vitiated form” (”Commentary on Eph, ad loc.”).
4. God’s mercy is the greatest expression of his love because it shows the total
gratuitousness of God’s love towards the sinner, whereby instead of punishing
him he forgives him and gives him life. The words “God, who is rich in mercy”
have great theological and spiritual depth: they are a kind of summary of all St
Paul’s teaching about God’s approach to people who are under the rule of sin,
who are “by nature children of wrath”.
Bl. John Paul II chose these words of Scripture, “dives in misericordia”, as the
title of one of his encyclicals, an encyclical which explores the divine dimension
f the mystery of Redemption. Here is how the Pope sums up biblical teaching on
mercy: “The concept of ‘mercy’ in the Old Testament has a long and rich history
[...]. It is significant that in their preaching the prophets link mercy, which they
often refer to because of the people’s sins, with the incisive image of love on
God’s part. The Lord loves Israel with the love of a special choosing, much like
the love of a spouse (cf. e.g. Hos 2:21-25 and 15; Is 54:6-8) and for this reason
he pardons its sins and even its infidelities and betrayals. When he finds repen-
tance and true conversion, he brings his people back to grace (cf. Her 31:20;
Ezek 39:25-29). In the preaching of the prophets “mercy” signifies a “special po-
wer of love”, which “prevails over the sin and infidelity” of the chosen people [...].
The Old Testament encourages people suffering from misfortune, especially
those weighed down by sin — as also the whole of Israel, which had entered into
the covenant with God — “to appeal for mercy”, and enables them to count upon
it” (”Dives In Misericordia”, 4).
In the New Testament also there are many references to God’s mercy, some-
times very touching ones, like the parable of the prodigal son (cf. Lk 15: 32);
others take a more dramatic form, for example, Christ’s sacrifice, the supreme
expression of the love of God, which is stronger than death and sin. “The ‘Cross
of Christ’, on which the Son, consubstantial with the Father, ‘renders full justice
to God’, is also ‘a radical revelation of mercy’, or rather of the love that goes
against what constitutes the very root of evil in the history of man: against sin
and death” (”ibid.”, 8).
5-6. The power of God works in the Christian in a way similar to that in which it
worked in Christ. St Paul here uses almost the same language as he did earlier
(cf. 1:20), to show how radical is the change produced in men by Christ’s salva-
tion.
Just as a dead person is unable to bring himself back to life, so those who are
dead through sin cannot obtain grace, supernatural life, by their own effort. Only
Christ, by means of the Redemption, offers us that new life which begins with ju-
stification and ends with resurrection and eternal happiness in heaven. The Apos-
tle is speaking here of that life of grace, and therefore of our future resurrection
and glorification with Christ in heaven; he refers to this as if it were an accom-
plished fact, and the reason he does so is this: Jesus Christ is our head and we
form one body with him (cf. Gal 3:28), and therefore we share in the head’s con-
dition. Christ, after his resurrection, sits at the right hand of the Father. “The bo-
dy of Christ, which the Church is”, St Augustine comments, “must be at the
right hand, that is, in the glory of heaven, as the Apostle says: ‘we have been
raised up with him and made to sit with him in heaven.’ Even though our body is
not yet there, our hope is already placed there” (”De Agone Christiano”, 26).
From the moment of our incorporation into Christ by Baptism, his resurrection
and exaltation is something which is already present in us in an incomplete way:
“Thus by Baptism”, Vatican II teaches, “men are grafted into the paschal mys-
tery of Christ; they die with him, are buried with him, and rise with him (cf. Rom
6:4; Eph 2:6; Col 3:1; 2 Tim 2:11f). They receive the spirit of adoption as sons in
which ‘we cry, Abba, Father’ (Rom 8:15) and thus become true adorers such as
the Father seeks (cf. Jn 4:23)” (”Sacrosanctum Concilium”, 6). See the note on
Rom 6:9-10.
The Redemption has already been accomplished, and man has available to him
all the grace he needs for salvation: the gates of heaven are open wide; it is now
the responsibility of every individual to make room for grace in his soul, to avail
of grace to respond to our Lord’s call. Through Christ, “we have been reborn spi-
ritually, for through him we are crucified to the world,” St Zozimus comments.
“By his death that decree of death has been destroyed which Adam caused and
which was passed on to every soul — that sentence which we incur through our
descent, from which absolutely no one is free prior to being set free by Baptism”
(”Epist. ‘Tractoria’, Dz-Sch”, 231).
8-9. Salvation is the work of God, a gratuitous gift of God: it originates in God’s
mercy. It acts in man by means of faith, that is, by man’s acceptance of the sal-
vation offered him in Jesus Christ. But even faith, St Paul tells us, is a divine gift;
man cannot merit it by his own efforts alone; it is not exclusively the outcome of
human freedom; at all stages, from the very beginning, recognition and accep-
tance of Christ as Savior means that God’s grace is at work.
On the basis of this passage in Ephesians and other passages of Scripture, the
Church has taught: “According to the passages of Sacred Scripture and the ex-
planations of the Holy Fathers [specified] we, with God’s help must believe and
preach the following: The free will of man was made so weak and unsteady
through the sin of the first man that, after the Fall, no one could love God as
was required, or believe in God, or perform good works for God unless the grace
of divine mercy anticipated him [...]. Even after the coming of Christ this grace of
faith is not found in the free will of all who desire to be baptized but is conferred
through the generosity of Christ, according to what has already been said and
according to what the Apostle Paul teaches: ‘It has been granted to you that for
the sake of Christ you should not only believe in him but also suffer for his sake’
(Phil 1:29). And also: ‘he who began a good work in you will bring it to completion
at the day of Jesus Christ’ (Phil 1:6). And again: ‘By grace you have been saved
through faith; and this is not your own doing, it is the gift of God’ (Eph 2:8). And
the Apostle says of himself: ‘As one who by the Lord’s mercy is trustworthy’ (1
Cor 7:25; cf. 1 Tim 1:13) [...]. And Scripture says further: ‘What have you that
you did not receive?’ (1 Cor 4:7). And again: ‘Every good endowment and every
perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of lights’ (Jas 1:17). And
again: ‘No one can receive anything except what is given from heaven’ (Jn 3:27)”
(Second Council of Orange, “De Gratia”, conclusion).
The Second Vatican Council provides the same teaching: “’By faith man freely
commits his entire self to God [...]; before this faith can be exercised, man must
have the grace of God to move and assist him; he must have the interior help of
the Holy Spirit, who moves the heart and converts it to God, who opens the eyes
of the mind and ‘makes it easy for all to accept and believe the truth’ (”De Gratia”,
can . 7; “Dei Filius”)’’ (”Dei Verbum”, 5).
When St Paul says that faith does not come from works (v. 9), he is referring to
things man can do on his own, without the help of grace. If faith did come from
works, then man would have something to boast to God about, something which
would bring salvation without dependence on Christ—which would be inadmissible,
because then our Lord’s death would make no sense, nor would even the Incar-
nation of the Word, whom “God has made our wisdom, our righteousness and
sanctification and redemption; therefore, as it is written, ‘Let him who boasts,
boast of the Lord”’ (1 Cor 1:30-31). See also the notes on Jas 2:14; Rom 3:20-
31; 9:31.
10. The Christian became a new creation—”we are his workmanship”— when he
was inserted into Christ at Baptism (cf. 2 Cor 5:17). Once justified by Baptism,
he should live in a manner consistent with his faith, that is, with his new life. The
life of grace in fact moves him to do those good works which God wishes to see
performed (he had already laid down that this should be so) and which perfect
the work of salvation. Deeds, works, prove the genuineness of faith: “faith by it-
self, if it has no works, is dead” (Jas 2:17). Without these works — the practice
of the theological and moral virtues—not only would faith be dead; our love for
God and neighbor would be false.
Having said that, it is also true that to bring about this renewal in man God
counts on man’s readiness to respond to grace and on his carrying out “good
works”.
Christian Tradition has always taught that the fruits of faith are a proof of its vita-
lity. For example, this is what St Polycarp has to say: “It does my heart good to
see how the solid roots of your faith, which have such a reputation ever since ear-
ly times, are still flourishing and bearing fruit in Jesus Christ [...]. Many desire to
share in your joy, well knowing that it is by the will of God that you are saved
through Jesus Christ” (”Letter to the Philippians”, chap. 1).
*********************************************************************************************
Source: “The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries”. Biblical text from the
Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries by members of
the Faculty of Theology, University of Navarre, Spain.
Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland, and
by Scepter Publishers in the United States.
From: Luke 12:13-21
Parable of the Rich Fool
*********************************************************************************************
Commentary:
13. This man is only interested in his own problems; he sees in Jesus only a tea-
cher with authority and prestige who can help sort out his case (cf. Deuteronomy
21:17). He is a good example of those who approach religious authorities not to
seek advice on the way they should go in their spiritual life, but rather to get them
to solve their material problems. Jesus vigorously rejects the man’s request — not
because He is insensitive to the injustice which may have been committed in this
family, but because it is not part of His redemptive mission to intervene in matters
of this kind. By His word and example the Master shows us that His work of sal-
vation is not aimed at solving the many social and family problems that arise in
human society; He has come to give us principles and moral standards which
should inspire our actions in temporal affairs, but not to give us precise, techni-
cal solutions to problems which arise; to that end He has endowed us with intel-
ligence and freedom.
15-21. After His statement in verse 15, Jesus tells the parable of the foolish rich
man: what folly it is to put our trust in amassing material goods to ensure we
have a comfortable life on earth, forgetting the goods of the spirit, which are what
really ensure us — through God’s mercy — of eternal life.
This is how St. Athanasius explained these words of our Lord: “A person who
lives as if he were to die every day — given that our life is uncertain by definition
— will not sin, for good fear extinguishes most of the disorder of our appetites;
whereas he who thinks he has a long life ahead of him will easily let himself be
dominated by pleasures” (”Adversus Antigonum”).
19. This man’s stupidity consisted in making material possession his only aim in
life and his only insurance policy. It is lawful for a person to want to own what he
needs for living, but if possession of material resources becomes an absolute, it
spells the ultimate destruction of the individual and of society. “Increased posses-
sion is not the ultimate goal of nations nor of individuals. All growth is ambivalent.
It is essential if man is to develop as a man, but in a way it imprisons man if he
considers it the supreme good, and it restricts his vision. Then we see hearts har-
den and minds close, and men no longer gather together in friendship but out of
self-interest, which soon leads to strife and disunity. The exclusive pursuit of pos-
sessions thus becomes an obstacle to individual fulfillment and to man’s true
greatness. Both for nations and for individual, avarice is the most evident form
of underdevelopment” (Paul VI, “Populorum Progressio”, 19).
*********************************************************************************************
Source: “The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries”. Biblical text from the
Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries by members of
the Faculty of Theology, University of Navarre, Spain.
Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland, and
by Scepter Publishers in the United States.
The history of the early Catholic Church. It's no mystery. Jesus was born in a literate society, with the Greeks writing, the Jews and the Romans.
I LOVE the dating.
Clement wrote in the 90's A.D.
Ignatius started his writings with "Today is December 20, A.D. 107."
Justin Martyr lived in 100 A.D.
Irenaeus was born in 130 A.D.
The whole book's source was the early historian EUSEBIUS PAMPHILUS, and his monumental book: History of the Church, written in 124 A.D.
I guess there was a reason that Jesus was born where He was.
Liturgical Colour: Red.
First reading |
---|
Ephesians 2:1-10 © |
Responsorial Psalm | Psalm 99:1-5 © |
---|
Gospel Acclamation | Ps24:4,5 |
---|
Or | Mt5:3 |
---|
Gospel | Luke 12:13-21 © |
---|
Pray for Pope Francis.
Is This Bishop Right about the Rosary Conquering Boko Haram? [Catholic Caucus]
Why Boko Haram and ISIS Target Women
Report reveals scale of Boko Haram violence inflicted on Nigerian Catholics
Military evacuating girls, women rescued from Boko Haram
Echos of Lepanto Nigerian bishop says rosary will bring down Boko Harm
After vision of Christ, Nigerian bishop says rosary will bring down Boko Haram (Catholic Caucus)
Nigerian Bishop Says Christ Showed Him How to Beat Islamic Terror Group
Luke | |||
English: Douay-Rheims | Latin: Vulgata Clementina | Greek NT: Byzantine/Majority Text (2000) | |
Luke 12 |
|||
13. | And one of the multitude said to him: Master, speak to my brother that he divide the inheritance with me. | Ait autem ei quidam de turba : Magister, dic fratri meo ut dividat mecum hæreditatem. | ειπεν δε τις αυτω εκ του οχλου διδασκαλε ειπε τω αδελφω μου μερισασθαι μετ εμου την κληρονομιαν |
14. | But he said to him: Man, who hath appointed me judge, or divider, over you? | At ille dixit illi : Homo, quis me constituit judicem, aut divisorem super vos ? | ο δε ειπεν αυτω ανθρωπε τις με κατεστησεν δικαστην η μεριστην εφ υμας |
15. | And he said to them: Take heed and beware of all covetousness; for a man's life doth not consist in the abundance of things which he possesseth. | Dixitque ad illos : Videte, et cavete ab omni avaritia : quia non in abundantia cujusquam vita ejus est ex his quæ possidet. | ειπεν δε προς αυτους ορατε και φυλασσεσθε απο της πλεονεξιας οτι ουκ εν τω περισσευειν τινι η ζωη αυτω εστιν εκ των υπαρχοντων αυτου |
16. | And he spoke a similitude to them, saying: The land of a certain rich man brought forth plenty of fruits. | Dixit autem similitudinem ad illos, dicens : Hominis cujusdam divitis uberes fructus ager attulit : | ειπεν δε παραβολην προς αυτους λεγων ανθρωπου τινος πλουσιου ευφορησεν η χωρα |
17. | And he thought within himself, saying: What shall I do, because I have no room where to bestow my fruits? | et cogitabat intra se dicens : Quid faciam, quia non habeo quo congregam fructus meos ? | και διελογιζετο εν εαυτω λεγων τι ποιησω οτι ουκ εχω που συναξω τους καρπους μου |
18. | And he said: This will I do: I will pull down my barns, and will build greater; and into them will I gather all things that are grown to me, and my goods. | Et dixit : Hoc faciam : destruam horrea mea, et majora faciam : et illuc congregabo omnia quæ nata sunt mihi, et bona mea, | και ειπεν τουτο ποιησω καθελω μου τας αποθηκας και μειζονας οικοδομησω και συναξω εκει παντα τα γενηματα μου και τα αγαθα μου |
19. | And I will say to my soul: Soul, thou hast much goods laid up for many years take thy rest; eat, drink, make good cheer. | et dicam animæ meæ : Anima, habes multa bona posita in annos plurimos : requiesce, comede, bibe, epulare. | και ερω τη ψυχη μου ψυχη εχεις πολλα αγαθα κειμενα εις ετη πολλα αναπαυου φαγε πιε ευφραινου |
20. | But God said to him: Thou fool, this night do they require thy soul of thee: and whose shall those things be which thou hast provided? | Dixit autem illi Deus : Stulte, hac nocte animam tuam repetunt a te : quæ autem parasti, cujus erunt ? | ειπεν δε αυτω ο θεος αφρον ταυτη τη νυκτι την ψυχην σου απαιτουσιν απο σου α δε ητοιμασας τινι εσται |
21. | So is he that layeth up treasure for himself, and is not rich towards God. | Sic est qui sibi thesaurizat, et non est in Deum dives. | ουτως ο θησαυριζων εαυτω και μη εις θεον πλουτων |
Saint Ignatius of Antioch,
Bishop and Martyr
Memorial
October 17th
Saint Ignatius of Antioch
Pope Benedict XVI General Audience, Wednesday, March 14, 2007
Dear Brothers and Sisters,
As we already did last Wednesday, we are speaking about the figures of the early Church. Last week we spoke of Pope Clement I, the third Successor of St Peter. Today, we will be speaking of St. Ignatius, who was the third Bishop of Antioch from 70 to 107, the date of his martyrdom. At that time, Rome, Alexandria and Antioch were the three great metropolises of the Roman Empire. The Council of Nicea mentioned three "primacies": Rome, but also Alexandria and Antioch participated in a certain sense in a "primacy".
St Ignatius was Bishop of Antioch, which today is located in Turkey. Here in Antioch, as we know from the Acts of the Apostles, a flourishing Christian community developed. Its first Bishop was the Apostle Peter - or so tradition claims - and it was there that the disciples were "for the first time called Christians" (Acts 11: 26). Eusebius of Caesarea, a fourth-century historian, dedicated an entire chapter of his Church History to the life and literary works of Ignatius (cf. 3: 36).
Eusebius writes: "The Report says that he [Ignatius] was sent from Syria to Rome, and became food for wild beasts on account of his testimony to Christ. And as he made the journey through Asia under the strictest military surveillance" (he called the guards "ten leopards" in his Letter to the Romans, 5: 1), "he fortified the parishes in the various cities where he stopped by homilies and exhortations, and warned them above all to be especially on their guard against the heresies that were then beginning to prevail, and exhorted them to hold fast to the tradition of the Apostles".
The first place Ignatius stopped on the way to his martyrdom was the city of Smyrna, where St Polycarp, a disciple of St John, was Bishop. Here, Ignatius wrote four letters, respectively to the Churches of Ephesus, Magnesia, Tralli and Rome. "Having left Smyrna", Eusebius continues, Ignatius reached Troas and "wrote again": two letters to the Churches of Philadelphia and Smyrna, and one to Bishop Polycarp.
Thus, Eusebius completes the list of his letters, which have come down to us from the Church of the first century as a precious treasure. In reading these texts one feels the freshness of the faith of the generation which had still known the Apostles. In these letters, the ardent love of a saint can also be felt.
Lastly, the martyr travelled from Troas to Rome, where he was thrown to fierce wild animals in the Flavian Amphitheatre.
No Church Father has expressed the longing for union with Christ and for life in him with the intensity of Ignatius. We therefore read the Gospel passage on the vine, which according to John's Gospel is Jesus. In fact, two spiritual "currents" converge in Ignatius, that of Paul, straining with all his might for union with Christ, and that of John, concentrated on life in him. In turn, these two currents translate into the imitation of Christ, whom Ignatius several times proclaimed as "my" or "our God".
Thus, Ignatius implores the Christians of Rome not to prevent his martyrdom since he is impatient "to attain to Jesus Christ". And he explains, "It is better for me to die on behalf of Jesus Christ than to reign over all the ends of the earth.... Him I seek, who died for us: him I desire, who rose again for our sake.... Permit me to be an imitator of the Passion of my God!" (Romans, 5-6).
One can perceive in these words on fire with love, the pronounced Christological "realism" typical of the Church of Antioch, more focused than ever on the Incarnation of the Son of God and on his true and concrete humanity: "Jesus Christ", St Ignatius wrote to the Smyrnaeans, "was truly of the seed of David", "he was truly born of a virgin", "and was truly nailed [to the Cross] for us" (1: 1).
Ignatius' irresistible longing for union with Christ was the foundation of a real "mysticism of unity". He describes himself: "I therefore did what befitted me as a man devoted to unity" (Philadelphians, 8: 1).
For Ignatius unity was first and foremost a prerogative of God, who, since he exists as Three Persons, is One in absolute unity. Ignatius often used to repeat that God is unity and that in God alone is unity found in its pure and original state. Unity to be brought about on this earth by Christians is no more than an imitation as close as possible to the divine archetype.
Thus, Ignatius reached the point of being able to work out a vision of the Church strongly reminiscent of certain expressions in Clement of Rome's Letter to the Corinthians.
For example, he wrote to the Christians of Ephesus: "It is fitting that you should concur with the will of your Bishop, which you also do. For your justly renowned presbytery, worthy of God, is fitted as exactly to the Bishop as the strings are to the harp. Therefore, in your concord and harmonious love, Jesus Christ is sung. And man by man, you become a choir, that being harmonious in love and taking up the song of God in unison you may with one voice sing to the Father..." (4: 1-2).
And after recommending to the Smyrnaeans: "Let no man do anything connected with Church without the Bishop", he confides to Polycarp: "My soul be for theirs who are submissive to the Bishop, to the presbyters and to the deacons, and may my portion be along with them in God! Labour together with one another; strive in company together; run together; suffer together; sleep together; and awake together as the stewards and associates and servants of God. Please him under whom you fight, and from whom you receive your wages. Let none of you be found a deserter. Let your Baptism endure as your arms; your faith as your helmet; your love as your spear; your patience as a complete panoply" (Polycarp, 6: 1-2).
Overall, it is possible to grasp in the Letters of Ignatius a sort of constant and fruitful dialectic between two characteristic aspects of Christian life: on the one hand, the hierarchical structure of the Ecclesial Community, and on the other, the fundamental unity that binds all the faithful in Christ.
Consequently, their roles cannot be opposed to one another. On the contrary, the insistence on communion among believers and of believers with their Pastors was constantly reformulated in eloquent images and analogies: the harp, strings, intonation, the concert, the symphony. The special responsibility of Bishops, priests and deacons in building the community is clear.This applies first of all to their invitation to love and unity. "Be one", Ignatius wrote to the Magnesians, echoing the prayer of Jesus at the Last Supper: "one supplication, one mind, one hope in love.... Therefore, all run together as into one temple of God, as to one altar, as to one Jesus Christ who came forth from one Father, and is with and has gone to one" (7: 1-2).
Ignatius was the first person in Christian literature to attribute to the Church the adjective "catholic" or "universal": "Wherever Jesus Christ is", he said, "there is the Catholic Church" (Smyrnaeans, 8: 2). And precisely in the service of unity to the Catholic Church, the Christian community of Rome exercised a sort of primacy of love: "The Church which presides in the place of the region of the Romans, and which is worthy of God, worthy of honour, worthy of the highest happiness... and which presides over love, is named from Christ, and from the Father..." (Romans, Prologue).
As can be seen, Ignatius is truly the "Doctor of Unity": unity of God and unity of Christ (despite the various heresies gaining ground which separated the human and the divine in Christ), unity of the Church, unity of the faithful in "faith and love, to which nothing is to be preferred" (Smyrnaeans, 6: 1).
Ultimately, Ignatius' realism invites the faithful of yesterday and today, invites us all, to make a gradual synthesis between configuration to Christ (union with him, life in him) and dedication to his Church (unity with the Bishop, generous service to the community and to the world).
To summarize, it is necessary to achieve a synthesis between communion of the Church within herself and mission, the proclamation of the Gospel to others, until the other speaks through one dimension and believers increasingly "have obtained the inseparable Spirit, who is Jesus Christ" (Magnesians, 15).
Imploring from the Lord this "grace of unity" and in the conviction that the whole Church presides in charity (cf. Romans, Prologue), I address to you yourselves the same hope with which Ignatius ended his Letter to the Trallians:"Love one another with an undivided heart. Let my spirit be sanctified by yours, not only now, but also when I shall attain to God.... In [Jesus Christ] may you be found unblemished" (13).
And let us pray that the Lord will help us to attain this unity and to be found at last unstained, because it is love that purifies souls.
© Copyright 2007 - Libreria Editrice Vatican
Collect:
Almighty ever-living God,
who adorn the sacred body of your Church
with the confessions of holy Martyrs,
grant, we pray,
that, just as the glorious passion of Saint Ignatius of Antioch,
which we celebrate today,
brought him eternal splendor,
so it may be for us unending protection.
Through our Lord Jesus Christ, your Son,
who lives and reigns with you in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, for ever and ever. +Amen.First Reading: Philippians 3:17 - 4:1
Brethren, join in imitating me, and mark those who so live as you have an example in us. For many, of whom I have often told you and now tell you even with tears, live as enemies of the cross of Christ. Their end is destruction, their god is the belly, and they glory in their shame, with minds set on earthly things. But our commonwealth is in heaven, and from it we await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, who will change our lowly body to be like his glorious body, by the power which enables him even to subject all things to himself.
Therefore, my brethren, whom I love and long for, my joy and crown, stand firm thus in the Lord, my beloved.Gospel Reading: John 12:24-26
Truly, truly, I say to you, unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it bears much fruit. He who loves his life loses it, and he who hates his life in this world will keep it for eternal life. If any one serves me, he must follow me; and where I am, there shall my servant be also; if any one serves me, the Father will honor him.
Related Page: The "God-Bearer" by Joanna Bogle, Advent-Christmas 2009.
Related Links on New Advent Website:
St. Ignatius writings, etc.:
- Epistle to the Ephesians
- Epistle to the Magnesians
- Epistle to the Trallians
- Epistle to the Romans
- Epistle to the Philadelphians
- Epistle to the Smyrnæans
- Epistle to Polycarp
- The Martyrdom of Ignatius
- The Spurious Epistles
The Ecclesiology of St. Ignatius of Antioch
St. Ignatius of Antioch - One, Holy, Catholic & Apostolic: The Early Church Was The Catholic Church
Ignatius of Antioch: Epistle to the Philadelphians
Two Fathers [Ignatius of Antioch, Polycarp of Smyrna]
St. Ignatius of Antioch and the Early Church
St. Ignatius of Antioch and the Early Church [Ecumenical]
The Mysticism of Saint Ignatius of Antioch
Ignatius of Antioch, Bishop and Martyr 17 October 107
Saint Ignatius Of Antioch Bishop, Martyr
St.Ignatius Of Antioch (A.D.110)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.