Posted on 05/21/2016 8:38:01 AM PDT by Salvation
You are wrong. Again!
I sent you a PM documenting, I wouldn’t want to be accused to crossposting. You might ask metmom why she would not give an answer.
verga will!
He'll toss ANYTHING against the wall to see if it sticks.
$2.00 a pound
Get 'em afore they start to smell...
Why do prots worship[ the Bible, why do they go off on tangents to push their agenda, why do they hijack threads thinking they have an opinion worth something?
In a time of universal church corruption - leaving it is what the BIBLE recommends.
Come on...
Show the rest of us!
You are very good at leaving off pertinent part of quotes. I guess I was correct to be suspicious. thank you for proving me correct. AGAIN!
Someone should be careful now, catholic haughty is showing through.
Back Attacha
I’m not Catholic, thanks be to God.
You might consider policing your own house before you take shots at us. This thread alone could use some of your “keen insight” on non-Catholic behavior.
Are you WILLING to show your 'evidence' or not?
You are very good at complaining.
Are you WILLING to show your 'evidence' or not?
That the fullness of Truth can find its origin (it's "seeds") in earlier thoughts and beliefs is certainly a true statement. But where in the writings of Ribera, Alcazar, or Bellarmine does one purport to find a hint of a Pre-Trib Rapture? They are known to have espoused a "futurist" view of Revelation and other Bible prophecy. But a futurist view of Biblical prophecy doesn't necessarily entail a Pre-Trib Rapture.
There has been one poster on this thread who claimed the PTR can be found in the writings of the Early Church Fathers. To say the least, said poster has failed in trying to substantiate that claim -- even to the point of making an attempt.
You're trying to put the PTR about a Millenium later (still late, though earlier than Margaret MacDonald). Though the proof that any of these men give credence to that is still lacking.
What in their writings supports a view of the PTR?
ealgeone; metmom, silence prove me correct.
Proves you correct on what?
As stated before, we cannot confirm or deny what you may or may not have seen regarding your, and so far, only your allegation that some small number of individuals may or may not be worshiping the Bible. Your claim continues to rest on hearsay evidence.
However, with catholicism there is more than ample evidence to show catholics worship Mary in thought, deed and action which has been shown on more than one ocassion in these threads.
The fact that you are somehow trying to say some may or may not worship the Bible is confirming that catholics worship Mary. It reminds me of the argument little kids, and some adults, use in saying "johnny did it so I did it" in an effort to somehow excuse their behavior.
Christianity condemns all form of idol worship. Be it Mary, the Bible, or whatever topic you want to insert.
It is catholicism that continues to advance this action of Mary worship with the rcc's blessings and admonition. That is the real error.
THAT is the only bottom line we need to worry about.
Catholics do not worship Mary anyone that says otherwise is a LIAR or an imbecile.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.