“Questionable character”??????
The filth and debauchery their lives displayed and the best you can do is call it “questionable character”??????
Those are the worst as far as morals etc. That certainly doesn’t imply that’s all there were. And the lists don’t even agree.
Perhaps some Catholic, like yourself, could post a list of the 10 best popes and let us know what they are so good for.
Must be there’s nothing to counter the lists I’ve been posting all that time cause I haven’t even seen the suggestion of that for all these years.
So go ahead. Give us a couple lists of the 10 best popes and how Christlike and moral they were.
You (All) will never tear down the Catholic Church with these relentless attacks, instead why don't you work on building yourselves up in the eyes of God.
I am certain this will fall mostly on deaf ears, but it is intended more for the lurkers.
We simply wave the Imperial Hand and move on to green pastures...
What the catholic apologists do not want anyone noticing in the popery of these degenerates is that they were most elected by a college of cardinals, all of whom are supposedly part of the infallible magicsteeringthem that supposedly prevents catholiciism from straying from the corerect path. Look at that Magisterium and see the real spiritual deadness running catholiciism.
Yup, questionable character....Most of their misdeeds were political and power struggles in very different times. If you check their biographies, they were mostly crooked politicians. There were a few exceptions to this, and some did some bizarre things, but none of them, not even one, attempted to change, as did ALL of the revolutionaries, what Christianity was. They may have had personal failures, but NEVER led people away from Christianity by changing its meaning.....as did every Protestant "reformer".