[piusv]

I do hope to be proven wrong, but so far? It seems to me that Bishop Schneider is merely applying the same old canard for Vatican II: it’s just ambiguous.

[schu]

The perennial and infallible teaching of the Church would no longer be universally valid

It seems when you start down this path thinking and proposing that you are the infallible word of God, but in reality you are just human, results like this are not that surprising. Are they? sschu

[rmichaelj]

Reading this initial partial translation I would disagree with you. For example:

“Bishop Schneider shows how the pope quotes Gaudium et Spes ” in a way unfortunately incorrect” in paragraph 329 of his exhortation, thereby applying a statement intended only to refer to a valid Christian marriage to situations involving the divorced and remarried, indicating therewith that one can validate such a union “not in theory, but in practice.”

He is stating that the Pope is incorrect. He won’t come out and state that the Pope is promoting heresy, but he is stating that Pope Francis is wrong.