[rmichaelj]

Reading this initial partial translation I would disagree with you. For example:

“Bishop Schneider shows how the pope quotes Gaudium et Spes ” in a way unfortunately incorrect” in paragraph 329 of his exhortation, thereby applying a statement intended only to refer to a valid Christian marriage to situations involving the divorced and remarried, indicating therewith that one can validate such a union “not in theory, but in practice.”

He is stating that the Pope is incorrect. He won’t come out and state that the Pope is promoting heresy, but he is stating that Pope Francis is wrong.

[piusv]

Ah, but Guadium Et Specs is a Vatican II document. So my guess is that he will excuse the error because Francis merely “misinterpreted” it.

[piusv]

Here is his final paragraph: An authentic interpretation of Al, on the part of the Apostolic See, would bring about a joy in clarity (« claritatis laetitia » for the whole Church. Such a clarity would guarantee a love in joy (« amoris laetitia »), a love and a joy which would not be according to the minds of men, but according to the mind of God (cf. Mt. 16, 23). And this is what counts for the joy, life, and eternal salvation of the divorced who have remarried and for all men.

See? We just haven't seen an "authentic" interpretation of AL. Such would bring about the clarity missing from all other interpretations.

More Vatican II nonsense.