Legal Writing professors aren’t usually tenure track, so you have here a very low level professor/lecturer and a visiting professor. Neither are permanent faculty and are not in a position to speak for the schools they purport to represent. I’d bet a fistful of dollars that neither will be back next year.
They may be profs at a Catholic school but they excommunicated themselves when they had their abortions.
I always remember what Ruth Bader Ginsburg said in the press conference where Slick announced her nomination. She said, paraphrasing, that a woman can never be equal to a man without the right to choose.
For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world, yet forfeits his soul?
As mentioned in related threads about abortion, please consider the following.
Note that, unlike the rights expressly protected by the Bill of Rights which the states amended to the Constitution, the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect the so-called right to have an abortion.
The reason that the so-called right to have an abortion now exists as a PC, ”constitutional” right is this. Corrupt, state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices not only stole legislative powers to wrongly politically ”amend” the Constitution from the bench with the so-called right to have an abortion, but they also wrongly breached the Founding States division of federal and state government powers as evidenced by the 10th Amendment (10A) and stole 10A-protected state legislative powers to do so.
The reason that the corrupt Court got away with doing so is because many generations of parents have not been making sure that their children are being taught about the federal governments constitutionally limited powers, 10th Amendment-protected state power to prohibit the constitutionally non-enumerated ”right” to have an abortion in this case.
But since the so-called right to have an abortion is not a constitutionally enumerated right, pro-abortion factions must continually fight for pro-abortion judges to be confirmed to the Supreme Court in order to keep the vote-winning, PC right to have an abortion alive.
Remember in November !
When patriots elect Trump, Cruz, or whatever conservative they elect, they need to also elect a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that will not only work within its Section 8-limited powers to support the new president, but also protect the states from federal government overreach, unconstitutional federal funding for abortion an example of such overreach.
Also, consider that such a Congress would probably be willing to fire state sovereignty-ignoring, pro-abortion activist justices.
How about these women exercise some self control when it comes to sexual encounters, then abortion wouldn’t be an issue.
Apparently that is too much to ask.
maybe if these whores (?) would just keep their legs a bit closer together, they would find they can succeed on their own merits ...without callously murdering defenseless bablies to do it
or something like that.
just saying... it could help them a whole lot if their priests were preaching/teaching/advocating wholesome moral values
(but maybe they have good priests and are just refusing to listen? who knows about people with such distorted values, anyway? They must have learned them from somewhere!? People aren’t born with such sickening attitudes, at least nobody I’ve ever known was...)
How about keeping you legs closed and not getting pregnant?
**Abortion Needed for ‘Personal or Professional Success’**
False.
I could not be the success I am today if I could not entertain ways of tax evasion
When those women face a lonely childless and grandchildless middle and old age, they’ll realize their personal and professional “success” didn’t amount to squat.
Oh, goody! Another opportunity for Cardinal Wuerl and the Archbishop of Milwaukee (whoever he is) to wring their hands, hide under their desks, and pretend they are powerless to do anything about pro-abortion professors at Jesuit schools.