Posted on 01/28/2016 3:14:07 PM PST by Read Write Repeat
https://youtu.be/XTP0j3p01Dg?t=6m21s
For your lists.
True, the Old Testament in the KJV isn’t perfect. No translation is. It is beautifully rendered, however, at least overall.
Why strive to read G-d’s own holy language, the very words with which He “spoke” the world into existence, when you can read a Dark Ages translation of a translation (of a translation.)
How do you write SARC in Hebrew?
Brothers and sisters of the Most High, take the initiative and start to fulfill Zechariah 8:23. Find your local neighborhood orthodox Jew (look for the strings hanging off the corners of his shirt,) and ask him to teach you Torah. Enough passive waiting. We want Moshiach now.
What?
Original source material in the very language the One-and-Only G-d used to create the world?
Outrageous!
Take five minutes and watch the video.
I take it this guy is an apologist for “Qaraite Judaism?”
So when the Mormon’s teach:
“We believe the Bible to be the word of God as far as it is translated correctly.”
This would be the more correct way of viewing the Bible then.
Interesting.
Wikipedia says he is a “Karaite Jew.” But he acts much more like a Protestant minister, and if he believes in J*sus no way is he a real Qara’i.
“when you can read a Dark Ages translation of a translation (of a translation.)
Not true. You need to do a little checking up on the translation of the King James.
Well, one of the nice things about the KJV is that we don’t need to rely on the translation alone. With Strong’s Concordance available to everyone online now, you can look up every word in the KJV to see the original Hebrew and the possible translations of the Hebrew words.
Some Christians simply won’t bother with that, but I have found those are usually the type that are emotionally attached to some interpretation they can only prop up if they don’t examine the source text.
“J*sus”
Why the asterisk in Jesus? It’s not some unspeakable “holy name”, it’s the name of a man, one that his Jewish friends were happy to write out in full many times.
“This would be the more correct way of viewing the Bible then.”
Well, that depends on the motivations behind their stance.
If their motives were to simply ensure that they are not attributing things to God inaccurately, then that would be a good and proper motive. However, with the Mormons, their motivation is to be able to freely ignore any parts of the Bible that conflict with the teachings of Joseph Smith. That’s not a good and proper motive.
Jews don’t believe Jesus was the Messiah. He’s definitely a Jew.
There are people in this world who are Hebrew scholars that talk like normal people to other normal people.
Yes, that’s true. Karaite Jews believe oral Torah doesn’t take precedence over written Torah.
The point is if you want to know God’s instructions (sorry, I don’t hyphenate), then you read the Tanakh in the original Hebrew as any translation is subject to fitting some man made religious theology.
I don’t see why any Orthodox Jew would take issue with that.
Jesus is the Latinized Greek version. Yeshua is the Romanized Hebrew version.
“However, with the Mormons, their motivation is to be able to freely ignore any parts of the Bible that conflict with the teachings of Joseph Smith. Thatâs not a good and proper motive.”
and you base this understanding of mormons’ motivations on what exactly?
He had a big audience there.... ;)
To clarify, there is no need to convert. Just to follow the G-d of Israel. (including shunning any notion of a trinity.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.