If it is a result of a natural scientific process, even if that is something we don’t understand, it is not a graven image made by someone to be worshipped. It is more like a photograph or a negative.
True enough.
As the decades and centuries go by scientists will be able to be more and more definitive about the shroud's authenticity.
It doesn't matter, though. One believes in Jesus as the Son of God and our Messiah or one doesn't. A shroud doesn't change that.
Hanen’t been watching the Shroud research lately. Last I heard it was a 14th century cloth. Has that conclusion changed?