I don't have any problem with what Scripture says. I have a problem with what you claim Scripture MEANS.
You objected to the idea that when Christ bled, his blood--on the ground, on the Shroud--could dry, corrupt, etc., supposedly on the basis of Scripture.
Then you ignored my question, which is: When Christ bled, is all the blood he shed incorruptible? Are all his hair, toenail clippings, fingernail clippings, skin cells he shed incorruptible?
All of His flesh and blood throughout His earthly life was incorruptible. That is not me interpreting the Bible. It is what it specifically says. All you have to do is read it and believe what it says.
It says that God would not allow His flesh to see corruption. And His blood was not corruptible.
Again, I see no reason why someone who accepts the virgin birth and resurrection would have a problem accepting that Christ’s earthly body and blood never went through any kind of corruption.
It is a miracle, like the resurrection and virgin birth. You do not need to know the means by which God did this. Just know that it is true.