All of His flesh and blood throughout His earthly life was incorruptible. That is not me interpreting the Bible. It is what it specifically says. All you have to do is read it and believe what it says.
It says that God would not allow His flesh to see corruption. And His blood was not corruptible.
Again, I see no reason why someone who accepts the virgin birth and resurrection would have a problem accepting that Christ’s earthly body and blood never went through any kind of corruption.
It is a miracle, like the resurrection and virgin birth. You do not need to know the means by which God did this. Just know that it is true.
Once again, you have ignored my question: Were his hair clippings, fingernail clippings, toenail clippings incorruptible? Was any blood that left his body incorruptible?
You argued that the blood on the Shroud, if it is the blood of Jesus, could not have corrupted during the last 2,000 years. Is that what you meant to say?
You have now ignored that issue multiple times, and just keep repeating like a parrot that Scripture says...Scripture says...Scripture says...
Well, Scripture DOESN’T say what you are claiming.
Jesus was circumcised as a baby...skin and blood involved here...no record of it being preserved anywhere, but it must still exist, intact, according to your theory.