Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arinze rebuts cardinal’s claim [] ‘Who do you think you are? Greater than Christ?’
Life Site News ^ | Wed Oct 21, 2015 - 9:59 am EST

Posted on 10/21/2015 1:01:52 PM PDT by GonzoII

ROME, October 21, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) -- Cardinal Francis Arinze of Nigeria strongly defended the Catholic faith against the proposal put forward by one influential Synod Father who said last week that it is “unrealistic” for the divorced-and-remarried to refrain from sexual activity – what the Church following Christ calls “adultery.”

Cardinal Reinhard Marx, archbishop of Berlin and a leading advisor to Pope Francis, had said such activity should be judged according to “lived context,” and that such persons should be able to receive Holy Communion.

However, Cardinal Arinze told LifeSiteNews in a video interview on Saturday, “The Ten Commandments are given to us by God. Have we any authority to say it is ‘unrealistic’ to expect people to keep any of the Ten Commandments, not only number six and number nine, also number five – abortion, killing of innocent people, number seven – stealing, whether small sums of money or big?”

“We cannot go on the reasoning that it is ‘unrealistic,’” added the cardinal, prefect emeritus of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments. “You can say it is not easy. I accept that. Christ never promised us that it is easy to follow him. He said those who want to be his disciples must ‘take up their cross daily and follow me.’”

Last week Cardinal Marx told bishops from around the world gathered at the Synod on the Family in Rome that “we should seriously consider” admitting to the sacrament of Holy Communion civilly divorced and remarried Catholics who have chosen to leave a “canonically valid” marriage.

“The advice to refrain from sexual acts in the new relationship not only appears unrealistic to many. It is also questionable whether sexual actions can be judged independent of the lived context,” he stated in his address. LifeSiteNews asked Arinze to respond to this statement, without telling him whose mouth it came from.

Arinze said the position ultimately amounts to allowing people to reject God’s laws outright. If we can tell the divorced and remarried that they no longer have to follow the commandment about not committing adultery, then why should we not tell other people that they no longer have to follow the remaining commandments, he said.

“You might as well tell the man who is walking in the office, and his secretary is a lady, that it is unreasonable to expect them to be chaste,” he said. “Likewise, it would be ‘unreasonable’ to expect people to be honest when they see a chance to take government money, or to take another person's property.”

“If you say, we cannot expect people to be chaste in that situation — to refrain from sexual relations — then you are challenging the fundamental teaching that sexual relations are correct only between husband and wife in a proper marriage, and that between any other two people, it is wrong, whether they are heterosexual or homosexual. It is wrong because it is against the order established by God the Creator.”

God invented marriage

The cardinal said that the Catholic position on marriage and the moral norm against adultery is not a human invention that can be amended, but is a “divine law” that comes from God and therefore cannot be changed.

“You cannot name a situation which Christ did not foresee, nor can you tell us that you are wiser than Christ and that you can modify what he has said. We will then ask you, ‘who do think you are? Greater than Christ?’ He is the way the truth and the life,” he said.

Arinze said that nobody, not even the pope, has the power to change the Church’s teaching on marriage and adultery.

“Marriage is not a human invention. God created Adam, and God said, ‘it is not good for man to be alone.’ So, he created Eve. The first man and woman were created by God, which means marriage comes from the creating hands of God. It isn’t the pope who made it; it isn't the United Nations; it isn't the parliament of any nation — no matter how powerful — which means that nobody has the right, or even the power, to reinvent marriage.”

Divorced and remarried Catholics living in sin

Those Catholics who are civilly divorced and remarried are “technically in a state of sin, even if their conscience excuses them,” he said.

“There is such a thing as a state of mortal sin. Mortal sin is a total turning away from God. It is a terrible thing. It can be in reference to any of the Commandments, not only the sixth and the ninth,” he said.

Someone who is in the state of mortal sin is not worthy of receiving Jesus in Holy Communion, he said.

“In that case, the person disqualifies himself or herself from receiving Holy Communion because the person is in a state of mortal sin. The simple catechism says the first condition for receiving Holy Communion fruitfully is to be in the state of grace.”

“If the person is in the state of mortal sin, and receives Holy Communion, the person indeed receives Christ, but no grace…Not only no grace, but the person commits sacrilege on top of the sins the person had before.”

“That's the case where St. Paul said, ‘let the person examine himself; he who receives unworthily receives judgment against himself.’ That is very severe,” he said.

Coming out of sin

Arinze said that receiving Jesus in Holy Communion when in the state of mortal sin can never be an occasion for helping someone come out of sin.

“To come out of sin the sacrament needed is penance, the one we popularly call confession. You go to the priest; you accept you did evil; you say it is through your fault; and you have determined, with God’s grace, to change. Then you get God's forgiveness. That helps."

“But if a person is in mortal sin and has no intention of leaving that action, then receiving Holy Communion does not help that person to become better, because sacrilege [has now been added] on top of the sin the person had before,” he said.

The cardinal said that living the Catholic faith authentically is not about “how we appear to other people,” but about “what God thinks of us.”

“All we have said now is about objective right and wrong,” he said, adding that only God alone can judge whether a person is culpable for the sins he or she has committed.

“Not even half a dozen Cardinals will judge that. God doesn't need our help to judge that. So you can see [the Catholic religion] is all about honesty and openness before God, not about what people think of us,” he said.


TOPICS: Catholic; Moral Issues; Theology
KEYWORDS: arinze; cardinalarinze; catholic
Complete Headline: Arinze rebuts cardinal’s claim that Catholic faith is unrealistic: ‘Who do you think you are? Greater than Christ?’
1 posted on 10/21/2015 1:01:52 PM PDT by GonzoII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Christ allowed the dissolution of marriage due to marital infidelity. If the faithful spouse divorces then re-marries, they have not sinned.


2 posted on 10/21/2015 1:12:10 PM PDT by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

I have seen and heard him. He tells it as it is. Marx is a Marxist, not a Catholic.


3 posted on 10/21/2015 1:12:25 PM PDT by RobbyS (quotes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
Given human nature and human weakness, I think it is "unrealistic" to think people will refrain from many sinful activities - but that does not make the activities any less sinful.

I do not think God expects us to be perfectly sin-free - but I know he expects us to TRY.

Of course, a high Church official attempting to rationalize away a sinful activity doesn't strike me as the best way for the Church to encourage its followers to try.

4 posted on 10/21/2015 1:16:06 PM PDT by WayneS (Yeah, it's probably sarcasm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon
Christ allowed the dissolution of marriage due to marital infidelity. If the faithful spouse divorces then re-marries, they have not sinned.

Depends on which Gospel you're talking about. Matthew contains that exception, Mark does not.

5 posted on 10/21/2015 1:20:08 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Each writer of the Gospel wrote what was important to them in the glorification of Yeshua.


6 posted on 10/21/2015 1:21:35 PM PDT by SkyDancer ("Nobody Said I Was Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Wish Arinze was Pope.


7 posted on 10/21/2015 1:21:57 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

bkmk


8 posted on 10/21/2015 4:35:25 PM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson