Posted on 09/29/2015 9:08:12 AM PDT by BlatherNaut
Papal Visit - Ominous Harbinger Of Things To Come
Several hours ago, the pope returned to the Vatican from the United States. We all got a glimpse into what we may expect from this pontificate - and it ain't pretty! We heard some snippets of exhortation to respect innocent life, but they were minuscule in comparison with the shillings for the allowance of illegal immigration, climate change, death penalty, arms trade, etc: all the talking points that had progressives (Obama included) waxing giddy with joy. Jim Sedlak of American Life League penned his opinion of some of the pope's addresses, with which I concur.
Ladies and gentlemen, at best the papal visit was an abysmal disappointment. More troubling is that progressives of many stripes were allowed to use the visit as bully pulpits to promote their anti-God agendas: from the gay-rights theatrics in New York and Philadelphia to the staged anchor-baby stunt during the DC parade. Michael Hichborn of Lepanto Institute put up some commentary on the debacles of last week, noting that these things did not occur in vacuums. Indeed, they could only have occurred with the connivance of the prelates of the respective venues in which they occurred.
In the first paragraph, I touched upon the various issues upon which the pope dwelt. Nowhere did he deal with abortion and same-sex #mowwidge with the same treatment as he did the others. In fact, I don't think he even mentioned them by name. Speaking of name, one name that was curiously absent from his lips was that of Jesus Christ (with the obvious exception of his Mass celebrations).
When I pointed this out to some other faithful Catholics, they contorted themselves into pretzels trying to justify this glaring negligence. They said things like: "he's being gentle" "he didn't come here to argue" "you catch more flies with honey than vinegar" "he refrained out of deference to the Jews and Muslims" "it's not the time nor the place" Mind you, all these came from faithful Catholics!
Ladies and gentlemen, since when is it considered argumentative to acknowledge - by name - Jesus Christ, the God Whom we serve and adore? As far as not being the time nor place, we are exhorted to preach the gospel "in season and out of season". All the excuses above have a common theme - being "nice". As we all know, "nice" is not a virtue. Have you noticed that the enemies of the faith are most astute and diligent in seizing every opportunity to promulgate their falsehoods? By and large, the mainstream culture applauds them, and we stand still for it in pseudo-respectful silence. When we dare lift our voices, that same culture shouts us down and too often we comply with their demands for our silence, for we "want to catch flies with honey and not vinegar". In other words, they define the terms and language of social conversation and debate and we acquiesce to it. Ladies and gentlemen, that is not legitimate kindness or deference. It is cowardice, rooted in an inordinate desire to be liked.
Speaking of being liked, Jesus had some things to say about that. From Luke 6:26 we read "Woe to you when men shall bless you: for according to these things did their fathers to the false prophets." Pope Francis was treated like a rock star in the mainstream culture whereas Jesus Christ was crucified. Think about it. More importantly, pray. If this past week is any harbinger of things to come, the upcoming Ordinary Synod on the Family could be disastrous.
You are not alone in your thinking.
He told us how bad we are, and then flew back to his private palace in his private country. I am not impressed.
The first paragraph in this comment is just as off the mark as your earlier comment. The pope has a chronic and acute habit of making off the cuff remarks of his own making - not inspired by God — and not in any sense infallible or even authoritative and definitely not part of the Magisterium.
Your Il Papa is a disaster.
Are you saying that it is not the Popes job to interpret the word of God? Whose job is it then? Is it the duty of every priest to interpret it how they see fit? That would completely split the church. It is the Pope that does this. His views are to be an expression of the ENTIRE Catholic church. You may not want to believe it, but that is how it works. Always has.
His comments may be off your “cuff”, but in terms of the Bible, the Pope is not incorrect. He feels that it is the duty, of those able, to help those who are unable to help themselves. He is against abortion because the Bible says it is wrong. He is against homosexuality because the Bible says it’s wrong, but he will NOT condemn homosexuals, because the Bible says that’s not his job. His views on climate change are not made from a scientific stand point, but instead makes it a point that people need to take care of the earth in order for other generation to cherish it as should be (what is so wrong about that?). True, he is unlike other Popes because he expresses the views that the church should take. I’m not so sure that this is a bad thing. As I said before, he only wants to help people. He doesn’t want to be the type of Pope you only see on Easter. He wants to create a more vocal catholic church in order to bring more people back to the faith.
So was JPII.
Eschatology is the unseen force in Islam, as it is in the RCC. In the latter’s case, it is Amillennialism, the belief that the millennial kingdom of Christ, Rev. 20, is here now on earth, and has been since the fall of Jerusalem (70AD) and Constantine, the Papacy is supposed to in control of this amillennial kingdom.
In tandem with European monarchs, they ruled Europe for over a thousand years, but for Sola Scriptura and the Protestant rebellion, they still would be.
It appears to me, that this Pope sees himself as the tool to bring that power back to Rome...through the mechanism of global socialism. He, himself, being an Argentinian Marxist.
At the root of all this is Amillennialism, as false a doctrine as has ever entered the mind of man.
I take it you're not Catholic? The pope can NOT reinterpret the Word; and as such, can NOT interpret the Word. You seem to confuse the Deposit of Faith with a man, the Pope. All men are fallen, faith in the Church that will prevail against Satan is faith in the Deposit of Faith, NOT faith in a man. There have been good and bad Popes, the Church remains.
As a catholic woman, I had an eerie feeling when he became pope. The feeling gets worse each and every time he does or says something.
Are you frigging serious??
You feel this way on FR because most of them think Catholics suck! Congrats! Feel Good?
Exactly.
"The teaching of the Faith which God has revealed has not been proposed as a philosophical discovery to be perfected by human ingenuity, but as a divine Deposit handed over to the Spouse of Christ to be guarded faithfully and to be explained infallibly. Hence that meaning of the sacred dogmas must perpetually be retained which Holy Mother Church once has declared; nor is that meaning ever to be abandoned under the pretext and name of a more profound comprehension." - First Vatican Council
Thank you for posting this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.