Then why not find another thread? Catholics have heard it all before too. Frankly, I'm not interested in all the rhetoric we get posted by those into anti-Catholicism.
By golly; GTG; I hear ya!
"One indeed is the universal Church of the faithful, outside which no one at all is saved, in which the priest himself is the sacrifice, Jesus Christ, whose body and blood are truly contained in the sacrament of the altar under the species of bread and wine; the bread (changed) into His body by the divine power of transubstantiation, and the wine into the blood, so that to accomplish the mystery of unity we ourselves receive from His (nature) what He Himself received from ours." — Pope Innocent III and Lateran Council IV (A.D. 1215)
Therefore, if anyone says that it is not by the institution of Christ the lord himself (that is to say, by divine law) that blessed Peter should have perpetual successors in the primacy over the whole Church; or that the Roman Pontiff is not the successor of blessed Peter in this primacy: let him be anathema. — Vatican 1, Ses. 4, Cp. 1
Is that a confession to there being at times, complex excuses offered as explanation? Not that any of that is your own fault, since you didn't invent the excuses and complex explanations.
More like had it programmed into them that there is no other proper way to think, so buy in, for they must.
Keep that up and somebody might be able to make an Apple fanboy out of you too, in addition.
I do think you may be mixing up your 'anti-Catholicism' with my own pro-Jesus Saves sort of thinking, but those two don't go as well together like say, peas and carrots, or chocolate and peanut butter.