Your syllogism is invalid. Undistributed middle.
I sense avoidance, and diversionary tactic. Anything but full and honest examination of Marionism, it's origins and sources, and the theological implications of that same.
We all know that's what has been going on from the very beginning of this thread, and was included within the underlying motivation for it having been posted here on FR. As if we really needed it HERE on this forum.
Why continue to deny what is so utterly, painfully obvious?
Show your work