Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Theology Chairman’s Same-Sex Wedding Begins ‘Flood’ of Challenges to Catholic Identity
Cardinal Newman Society ^ | July 7, 2015 | CNS staff

Posted on 07/08/2015 6:40:36 AM PDT by NYer

fordhamThe Episcopalian marriage of Fordham University’s theology chairman to his same-sex partner, just one day after the Supreme Court’s marriage ruling, begins a new flood of challenges to Catholic identity that most Catholic colleges and universities are unprepared to face, warns Cardinal Newman Society President Patrick Reilly.

“Even if a Catholic college leader wants to uphold Catholic teaching on marriage, the persistent embrace of dissent and opposition to the Church at many Catholic universities makes it highly unlikely that the law will now permit them to uphold moral standards for professors,” Reilly said.

“The fact that a theology chairman at a Catholic university apparently waited for the Supreme Court’s ruling to publicly affirm his disregard for Catholic teaching is a sign that the sky has opened, and wayward Catholic universities are about to face a flood of consequences following upon decades of inconsistent Catholic identity.”

Dr. Patrick Hornbeck II was declared married at St. Bartholomew’s Episcopal Church in Manhattan, according to The New York Times. Critics immediately questioned how the University expects Catholic theology to be sincerely “taught in a manner faithful to Scripture, Tradition, and the Church’s Magisterium,” as required by the Church’s constitution on higher education, Ex corde Ecclesiae, particularly when the head of the theology department openly disregards Church teaching on marriage and sexuality.

Hornbeck, who also teaches medieval and reformation history at Fordham, had previously made his views on gender identity and homosexuality known despite his position in the theology department. He recently led a discussion on “Sexuality and the Church” for Fordham alumni, addressing issues of same-sex marriage and gender identity, as reported by the Observer. The student publication stated that Hornbeck viewed gender as a socially constructed subject in which the Church has no teaching and has therefore chosen to remain silent.

However, Pope Francis has not been silent on the matter of marriage or gender identity. The Holy Father recently reflected on “God’s original plan for man and woman as a couple,” during which he described marriage and family as the foundation and “masterpiece of society.”

In April, Pope Francis addressed problems with “gender theory” and urged acceptance of sexuality as male and female in line with official Church teaching:

As we all know, sexual difference is present in so many forms of life, in the long scale of the living. However, only in man and in woman does it bear in itself the image and likeness of God… Man and woman are [the] image and likeness of God!

… Modern and contemporary culture has opened new areas, new freedoms and new depths for the enrichment of the understanding of this difference. However, it has also introduced many doubts and much skepticism. For instance, I wonder, for example, if the so-called gender theory is not also an expression of a frustration and of a resignation, which aims to cancel the sexual difference because it no longer knows how to address it. Yes, we risk taking a step backward. The removal of the difference, in fact, is the problem, not the solution. To resolve their problems of relation, man and woman must instead talk more to one another, listen more to one another, know one another more, love one another more.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches regarding sexual identity that “man and woman have been created… in their respective beings as man and woman” and that “‘being man’ or ‘being woman’ is a reality which is good and willed by God.”

Last year, Dr. Hornbeck spoke at the University symposium “Who Am I to Judge? How Pope Francis Is Changing the Church,” but it is unclear if he attempted to reconcile the views of Pope Francis and the Church with his own. Also the editor of “More than a Monologue: Sexual Diversity and the Catholic Church,” Hornbeck is a regular writer and speaker on LGBTQ approaches to Christianity. In 2011, The Cardinal Newman Society wrote a report exposing the “More than a Monologue” conference, which took place at both Fordham and Fairfield University, as “a well-orchestrated attempt to undermine the Church’s doctrine.”

Hornbeck’s Fordham faculty page states that he has received grants to study “the legal, ethical, and theological dimensions of the relationship between lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons and the American Catholic Church.”

Fordham’s senior director of communications Bob Howe was recently asked whether the University is concerned about Hornbeck’s recent opposition to Catholic Church teaching. Howe told Aleteia that same-sex unions are “now the law of the land, and Professor Hornbeck has the same constitutional right to marriage as all Americans.”

“While Catholic teachings do not support same-sex marriage, we wish Professor Hornbeck and his spouse a rich life filled with many blessings on the occasion of their wedding in the Episcopal Church,” Howe reportedly stated. “Professor Hornbeck is a member of the Fordham community, and like all University employees, students and alumni, is entitled to human dignity without regard to race, creed, gender, and sexual orientation.”

The Cardinal Newman Society reached out to Howe to clarify his statement and ask what policies were in place to assure faithful Catholic theology is handed on to students. No response was received by the time of publication.

In May, Bishop Frank Dewane of Venice, Fla., stated that Catholic families have a “right to know” which theology professors teach in line with the Catholic Church. If those Catholic institutions cannot assure that its theology professors have obtained the academic mandatum or faithfully impart Catholic doctrine, then families should look to more faithful Catholic institutions, he suggested.

Not alone in his plea, Bishop Frank Caggiano of Bridgeport, Conn., noted that faithful Catholic education is even more essential in reclaiming the steadily declining millennial generation. The fact remains, the bishop continued, that Catholic colleges are uniquely placed to address the indifference found in the millennials whose views can be summarized by the phrase, ‘I am spiritual, but I am not religious.’

This stance has also been echoed by The Catholic University of America’s new provost, Dr. Andrew Abela, who stressed the responsibility of Catholic colleges to hire those who can faithfully teach the truths of the Catholic Church.

“It’s important to hire faithful Catholic faculty because we have, as a Catholic university, a certain view of reality laid out in the Apostles’ and Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creeds,” he explained to the Newman Society. This Catholic understanding of the world is promoted and maintained then, he said, “by hiring professors who share it.”



TOPICS: Catholic; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture; Theology
KEYWORDS: academia; catholic; education; episcopal; fordham; fordhamuniv; fordhamuniversity; globalwarminghoax; homosexualagenda; jesuit; jesuits; libertarians; medicalmarijuana; nyc; obamanation; pope; popefrancis; romancatholicism; whoamitojudge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: verga
It would seem that if the Catholic Church wanted a simple solution, it could be executed in two steps:

1. Remove from all activities associated with the university all faculty members, tenured or not, and continue their current levels of pay and benefits. Those costs would cease at their deaths, making that a predictable cost.

2. Insert a clause in all new contracts that deviations from Church teachings would supersede any tenure and that penalties could include suspension or contract termination.

These steps would separate Caesar's laws from God's laws. I will freely admit that I am not a Catholic. I only suggest that this may be a way out of this and future similar problems.

21 posted on 07/08/2015 9:19:15 AM PDT by Pecos (What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FateAmenableToChange
With few exceptions, I am talking about the church as a whole, not just the RCC. Christians let their message get diluted and controlled by the world in order to attract more of the world and its money.

Good observations. The issue now, however, is that with the legalization of gay marriage, it is no longer possible to dismiss individuals from their positions of power as a result of their lifestyle. It's a lawsuit waiting to happen. Hornbeck intentionally scheduled his wedding for the day after the SCOTUS decision.

Hornbeck’s Fordham faculty page states that he has received grants to study “the legal, ethical, and theological dimensions of the relationship between lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons and the American Catholic Church.”

Whatever the source, those grants are intended to find a wedge to drive into the Catholic Church. It's been tried in the past. We're still here.

22 posted on 07/08/2015 9:25:24 AM PDT by NYer (Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy them. Mt 6:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The seemingly odd thing is that a non-Catholic leftist is the chair of the theology department at a traditionally Catholic college. Unfortunately, this is not unusual at all as most US Catholic colleges have become thoroughly secularized.


23 posted on 07/08/2015 10:08:34 AM PDT by iowamark (I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Thank you that for that link:

Wall Street Journal, January 2 2009: “How Support for Abortion Became Kennedy Dogma” by Anne Hendershott
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB123086375678148323
“”In some cases, church leaders actually started providing “cover” for Catholic pro-choice politicians who wanted to vote in favor of abortion rights. At a meeting at the Kennedy compound in Hyannisport, Mass., on a hot summer day in 1964, the Kennedy family and its advisers and allies were coached by leading theologians and Catholic college professors on how to accept and promote abortion with a “clear conscience.”

The former Jesuit priest Albert Jonsen, emeritus professor of ethics at the University of Washington, recalls the meeting in his book “The Birth of Bioethics” (Oxford, 2003). He writes about how he joined with the Rev. Joseph Fuchs, a Catholic moral theologian; the Rev. Robert Drinan, then dean of Boston College Law School; and three academic theologians, the Revs. Giles Milhaven, Richard McCormick and Charles Curran, to enable the Kennedy family to redefine support for abortion.

Mr. Jonsen writes that the Hyannisport colloquium was influenced by the position of another Jesuit, the Rev. John Courtney Murray, a position that “distinguished between the moral aspects of an issue and the feasibility of enacting legislation about that issue.” It was the consensus at the Hyannisport conclave that Catholic politicians “might tolerate legislation that would permit abortion under certain circumstances if political efforts to repress this moral error led to greater perils to social peace and order.”

Father Milhaven later recalled the Hyannisport meeting during a 1984 breakfast briefing of Catholics for a Free Choice: “The theologians worked for a day and a half among ourselves at a nearby hotel. In the evening we answered questions from the Kennedys and the Shrivers. Though the theologians disagreed on many a point, they all concurred on certain basics . . . and that was that a Catholic politician could in good conscience vote in favor of abortion.””


24 posted on 07/08/2015 10:13:58 AM PDT by iowamark (I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Hillsdale College, and I believe Grove City also, both refuse all federal funding in order to avoid that type of government intervention into their university message. I don’t know of any religious colleges or universities that are similarly careful, and that’s exactly how the wedge gets driven in.

This is part of what drives me crazy about cultural Christians in general and cultural Catholics in particular. (There are cultural protestants, but since there are so many protestant denominations they can hide more easily). Where is church discipline? Nancy Pelosi slaps the church in the face every time she claims to be a catholic and argues for abortion, homosexual rights, etc. How is she still not excommunicated?

Acquaintances of mine who claim to be Catholic nonetheless promote not just a secular lifestyle, but actual heresies and apostasies that were burning offenses at one point. The trinity is optional, Jesus was just a good teacher, women have a right to an abortion, the Bible doesn’t really mean it’s sinful for two guys to engage in sodomy as long as they really “love” each other, and Dan Brown really nailed it with his expose on Leonardo DaVinci’s conspiracy with Constantine to conceal the grave of Jesus. And they get upset when I suggest that it sounds like they don’t hold any orthodox beliefs sanctioned by the church. Are the priests just not seeing this? People can believe what they want, but they remain completely comfortable claiming to be Catholic despite rejecting all of the church’s teachings.


25 posted on 07/08/2015 11:48:40 AM PDT by FateAmenableToChange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NYer

If the Pope wanted to do something really useful, perhaps he could thoroughly reform his own Jesuit order to bring them back to orthodoxy. Not going to happen, I know, but one can wish.


26 posted on 07/08/2015 7:27:16 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson