Didn’t you read post 1?
What else are they wrong about? I didn’t see anything. That’s why I would be willing to figure that it’s just a matter of careless wording.
TD Jakes has other issues that are more glaring. That prosperity gospel stuff is plenty enough but when you take all his stuff together, that’s less excusable.
I did read post 1.
But this is a pretty huge deal, not just some disagreement about a nonessential issue.
Again, if they are this sloppy with a fundamental doctrine, what other issues are they wrong about, maybe not in the above doctrine, but in teaching materials they use to teach children.
But I guess I’m in the minority here so I have spoken my peace and I’ll go play elsewhere.
Didn’t you read post 1?What else are they wrong about? I didn’t see anything. That’s why I would be willing to figure that it’s just a matter of careless wording.
Reading it, I classify it as "generic American evangelical". Vague and general, by and large correct, but narrowing in on some idiosyncratic particulars that would lock out (among others) Lutherans and the Reformed & Presbyterians.