[Syncro]

Yes, Salvation accused you of mindreading over Post #96

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3299206/posts?page=96#96

Her complaint was removed.

I think your post 96 overloaded the thread with Truth from the Bible (for certain factions here) and it was a feeble attempt to get you...and Biblical Truth...censored.

[Salvation]

Thank you pinging me since you seem to be interested.

I will pray for all of you.

[daniel1212]

Yes, Salvation accused you of mindreading over Post #96 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3299206/posts?page=96#96 Her complaint was removed. I think your post 96 overloaded the thread with Truth from the Bible

I can see why in this case why it might be perceived as too personal (but not as mind-reading) as i meant to say "your post is simply an example of the misuse of Scripture," versus "You are simply an example of the misuse of Scripture" which grammatically is incorrect anyway.

But it seems such hair-trigger objections have been often seen since a certain poster was called out for a practice of daily making numerous posts to herself, which included many unattributed pastes. .

My experience with the mods over many years is that the RM rules are reasonable, and their intervention judicious, and their judgement fair and correct (in stark contrast to the reactionary heavy-handed mods at Catholic answers, and many others).

Reacting as if one has a vendetta after being cited does not help the issue, and only makes their job more difficult.