[Salvation]

I am not in error. Please, no personal attacks.

[WVKayaker]

I know how to make personal attacks, FRiend, and that wasn't one.

You posted to Daniel1212 about the Holy Spirit, when he quoted one of YOUR Roman Catholic cultic posts about the role of the Roman Catholic cult's mary.

What you posted did not respond to the QUOTE FROM A ROMAN CATHOLIC, but called him wrong.

I pointed to your error. It wasn't a personal attack!

Maybe these opposition threads are a little heavy for some of the Roman Catholics to digest, but Christians are compelled by the Holy Spirit (who guides our hearts and minds) to correct the errors we observe.

It seems that Roman Catholics on these threads are more concerned with affirming their heresies, which contradict Scripture.

Just as Rome tries to put Peter as the first leader of the church, we see that Paul, like Jesus, had to rebuke Pete for error. Rome is not the source for all truth. It displays little allegiance to it!

I could continue to post more of the unScriptural products of Roman mythology, but this forum is not big enough and I don't want to waste my time. I have lunch to make!

[metmom]

I am not in error. Please, no personal attacks.

WVK made no personal attack in his post to which you are responding.

Unless you consider someone telling you that you're wrong a *personal attack* in which case, RC's are equally guilty of *personal attacks* at the very least because they certainly have no problem telling others that they are wrong.

[avenir]

“Words such as “false” “error” “wrong” “inaccurate” “misstatement” do not attribute motive and are not “making it personal.”

Courtesy Religion Moderator Rules.

[Syncro]

I am not in error. Please, no personal attacks.

Your post 100: “Wrong!”

If that is allowed, why not point out error?

Rules are for everyone, not just those that disagree with your belief system.

If pointing out error is a personal attack, so is posting Wrong! to another poster.

Please be consistent in your accusations.