Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley

This started a long time ago, when families were expected to “grant” one of their children to the church. A family might have selected an effeminate male, thinking that they’d be unlikely to produce more children or grandchildren—unknowing of the consequences to the future.


17 posted on 05/27/2015 7:09:46 AM PDT by Does so (SCOTUS Newbies Will Imperil America...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Does so

A family might have selected an effeminate male, thinking that they’d be unlikely to produce more children or grandchildren

effeminate males have long gravitated towards the clergy of all stripes, which is why for the most part the clergy was not highly thought of by other well ordered males...women, on the other hand, idealized these individuals, thus giving them station otherwise unobtainable...

it is still that way today...who runs the local parishes, men or women? Who devotes the hours and energy required to make the social club atmosphere of the modern church function, men or women? In my opinion, were it left to men to decide, going to church at all would be sporadic in quantity, and perfunctory in quality...and the old bugaboo of homosexual participation in the clergy is all the more prevalent today, and working its old black magic...


19 posted on 05/27/2015 7:43:01 AM PDT by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson