American Jacobins: Sexual Revolutionaries Prepare the Battlespace for a De-Christianized America

NRO ^ | April 29, 2015 | David French

[QT3.14]

In yesterday’s oral arguments in Obergefell v. Hodges (better known as the “gay-marriage case”), the solicitor general of the United States committed a classic “Kinsley gaffe”: He accidentally told the truth. Normally, in any argument about the next legal step of the sexual revolution, the accusation or even implication that there’s a slippery slope is grounds for outrage. Not only shouldn’t we explore the legal implications of expanding the definition of marriage, the very attempt is homophobic. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

[loveliberty2]

"It is necessary, then, in order to seize authority in a republic and imprint an evil form upon it, to find that the social fabric has broken down over time, and that little by little and from generation to generation, it has been thrown into disorder; this will come about by necessity, when it is not often renewed by good examples or by new laws to bring it back to its beginnings." - Niccolo Machiavelli circa 1519, Discourses on Livy.

[Pelham]

This shouldn’t be a surprise. The Civil Rights Act set in motion the ability of government officials to determine what is acceptable belief for the peasants known as American citizens. And this is just the next step. But somehow I doubt that this will be enforced on the Muslim community.

[2ndDivisionVet]

Already posted:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3284736/posts

[stephenjohnbanker]

“somehow I doubt that this will be enforced on the Muslim community.”

Ya think ?

[1010RD]

Homoeroticism is the correct definition, not homosexuality. Their actions are not sexual, because that would imply the ability to reproduce.

It’s something that is most likely learned or epigenetic, but not genetic.

[LouAvul]

Whatever vestige of "Christianity" America claimed was forfeited when it became the law of the land to murder unborn children by the tens of millions. As a nation we espoused that abomination and as a nation are at war with God.

By no stretch of the imagination is such a nation "Christian." Only somebody like, say, Joel Olsteen could claim otherwise, viz. by hiding one's head in the sand and pretending all is well.

Proverbs 6 says God hates the hands that shed innocent blood, and He hates abortion. That might be one of the reason He's giving America to our enemies. Read the Old Testament prophets for a parallel.

[plain talk]

Heterosexual and homosexual people can have sex without reproducing. Heterosexual people can be fixed or use birth control. Bill Clinton engaged in a sex act although it would not have resulted in reproduction.

[1010RD]

So sex isn’t for reproduction? That’s its purpose. Always has been and always will be. Don’t use the enemies language.

Homosexuality can never result in offspring. Bill Clinton engaged in eroticism. The idea is that it’s simply eroticism and in this case homoeroticism. There are many erotic acts, only one of which heterosexuality can ever result in children. Capisce?

[plain talk]

no

[1010RD]

Sexual vs. Asexual Reproduction

Living things use lots of different strategies for producing offspring, but most strategies fall neatly into the categories of either sexual or asexual reproduction. Asexual reproduction generates offspring that are genetically identical to a single parent. In sexual reproduction, two parents contribute genetic information to produce unique offspring.

Over 99.9% of eukaryotes reproduce sexually.

Homosexuals aren’t trying to reproduce at all, neither asexually or sexually. It is erotic, but not sexual.

Hence homoeroticism, along with a whole plethora of eroticism. Homosexuality isn’t the opposite of heterosexuality because there isn’t actual sex. It’s more correct to call it homoeroticism.

Erotic adjective, Also, erotical
1. arousing or satisfying sexual desire.

Masturbation is also erotic, in this case autoerotic.

Erhalten Sie es?