How about you read the same scripture that metmom posted and tell her from that scripture where she is wrong...
You’re here telling me that I’m wrong.
How is what you’re condemning me for any different that what anyone else does on these threads?
Oh, and BTW, I don’t go around telling people that if they aren’t (fill in the blank with my denomination) they are going to hell, as Catholicism is known to do.
Why not?
Are not in BIG Trouble without it??
"One indeed is the universal Church of the faithful, outside which no one at all is saved, in which the priest himself is the sacrifice, Jesus Christ, whose body and blood are truly contained in the sacrament of the altar under the species of bread and wine; the bread (changed) into His body by the divine power of transubstantiation, and the wine into the blood, so that to accomplish the mystery of unity we ourselves receive from His (nature) what He Himself received from ours." Pope Innocent III and Lateran Council IV (A.D. 1215)
Therefore, if anyone says that it is not by the institution of Christ the lord himself (that is to say, by divine law) that blessed Peter should have perpetual successors in the primacy over the whole Church; or that the Roman Pontiff is not the successor of blessed Peter in this primacy: let him be anathema. Vatican 1, Ses. 4, Cp. 1