Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Elsie

Acts wasn’t written in English, now was it? That is a great starting point. Second, it isn’t just the literal translation from the original language, rather, it is the understanding of the context, references, and double and triple meanings at the time of writing.

As I have quoted Scripture, on several occasions, and on several different threads, the response is generally the same; to claim it isn’t what it says.

Case in point, John 6. Jesus clearly says we must eat of His physical body and drink His blood, yet most non-Catholics don’t believe that.


170 posted on 04/16/2015 4:45:27 AM PDT by SpirituTuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]


To: SpirituTuo
Acts wasn’t written in English, now was it?

What?

Can't you do any better than that?

Let's ignore all of your popes that did/do not speak English!

Let's ignore LATIN!!!

You'll have to do a lot better than this to try to brush away what the text plainly says.

171 posted on 04/16/2015 5:58:13 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson