Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Our paschal lamb
Triablogue ^ | March 16, 2014 | Steve

Posted on 04/02/2015 3:27:09 PM PDT by RnMomof7

Our paschal lamb


The Passover

Tell all the congregation of Israel that on the tenth day of this month every man shall take a lamb according to their fathers' houses, a lamb for a household. And if the household is too small for a lamb, then he and his nearest neighbor shall take according to the number of persons; according to what each can eat you shall make your count for the lamb. Your lamb shall be without blemish, a male a year old. You may take it from the sheep or from the goats, and you shall keep it until the fourteenth day of this month, when the whole assembly of the congregation of Israel shall kill their lambs at twilight. 
“Then they shall take some of the blood and put it on the two doorposts and the lintel of the houses in which they eat it. 11 It is the Lord's Passover. 12 For I will pass through the land of Egypt that night, and I will strike all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, both man and beast; and on all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgments: I am the Lord. 13 The blood shall be a sign for you, on the houses where you are. And when I see the blood, I will pass over you, and no plague will befall you to destroy you, when I strike the land of Egypt. 
21 Then Moses called all the elders of Israel and said to them, “Go and select lambs for yourselves according to your clans, and kill the Passover lamb. 22 Take a bunch of hyssop and dip it in the blood that is in the basin, and touch the lintel and the two doorposts with the blood that is in the basin. None of you shall go out of the door of his house until the morning. 23 For the Lord will pass through to strike the Egyptians, and when he sees the blood on the lintel and on the two doorposts, the Lord will pass over the door and will not allow the destroyer to enter your houses to strike you (Exod 12:3-7,11-13,21-22). 

The Last Supper
Then came the day of Unleavened Bread, on which the Passover lamb had to be sacrificed. So Jesus sent Peter and John, saying, “Go and prepare the Passover for us, that we may eat it.”  
14 And when the hour came, he reclined at table, and the apostles with him. 15 And he said to them, “I have earnestly desired to eat this Passover with you before I suffer. 16 For I tell you I will not eat it until it is fulfilled in the kingdom of God.” 17 And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks he said, “Take this, and divide it among yourselves. 18 For I tell you that from now on I will not drink of the fruit of the vine until the kingdom of God comes.” 19 And he took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and gave it to them, saying, “This is my body, which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me.” 20 And likewise the cup after they had eaten, saying, “This cup that is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood (Lk 22:7-8,14-20).
Few doctrines have suffered a more systematic distortion than the Eucharist. This is ironic because the actual significance of the Eucharist is transparent and straightforward.
The Last Supper is based on the Passover. That's not to say it's identical to a Seder meal. It's an analogy, inviting comparison and contrast. As you'd expect, the Last Supper has a more specifically Christian significance. What do they share in common?
i) The Passover is a meal. A communal meal.
ii) The Passover illustrates a substitutionary principle, where the paschal lamb dies in place of the firstborn male. 
iii) And you have the function of the blood. Not merely blood, but shed blood. 
iv) Although it's a meal, the significance of the rite isn't based on consuming the elements. It's not about internalizing the meat and blood.
To the contrary, the lamb is exsanguinated, to avoid consumption of the blood. The blood is external to the celebrant. 
The blood is not inside the celebrants. Rather, the celebrants are inside their homes, while the blood is painted on the doorway. The doorway is both an entrance and an exit. It represents the boundary between the home and the outside world.
The blood is a "sign" (v13). In the Passover rite, painting the doorway with blood forms an emblematic barrier, which prevents the Destroyer from transgressing the premises and executing the firstborn male within. This is a bit of divine theater. And object lesson. 
So the blood has a protective function. It shields the firstborn male from divine judgment. 
These basic principles carry over to the Last Supper:
i) The rite depicts the vicarious atonement of Christ. That's already clear from its background in the Passover, but is reinforced by allusions to the Suffering Servant (Isa 53:6,10,12, LXX). 
The elements are somewhat different. There's an emphasis on bread and wine rather than the lamb. That's because Jesus will take the place of the lamb. No doubt the original Passover meal involved wine to wash down the solid food. But that ritual already had literal blood (the shed blood of the lamb), so there was no need for another element (wine) to symbolize blood–in contrast to the Last Supper. 
ii) On analogy with the Passover, this is not about consuming blood. This is not about internalizing the body and blood of Christ.
Rather, the blood retains its protective significance. The wine represents the shed blood of Christ, anticipating the Crucifixion–just hours away. The bread represents the body of Christ, soon to suffer violent death. A sacrificial victim. 
The blood of Christ shields the Christian from divine judgment. In this case, eschatological judgment (damnation) rather than physical death (the plague of the firstborn). The blood of Christ is "outside" us rather than inside us–like a protective barrier. 


TOPICS: Apologetics; Evangelical Christian; Theology; Worship
KEYWORDS: eucharist; holythursday; ordinance; remembrance

1 posted on 04/02/2015 3:27:09 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7

Nice post. Can you vouch for Steve?


2 posted on 04/02/2015 3:31:45 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; CynicalBear; daniel1212; Gamecock; HossB86; Iscool; ...

ping


3 posted on 04/02/2015 3:34:17 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

As much as you can vouch for anything on the web :)


4 posted on 04/02/2015 3:35:01 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7

Just asking, before investing more time at the site. Thanks. R2z


5 posted on 04/02/2015 3:37:31 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

Site seems solid apologetics


6 posted on 04/02/2015 3:42:41 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7

That was excellent but will go right over the heads of many.


7 posted on 04/02/2015 3:45:25 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero
He's got this posted about himself.

I doubled majored in history and Classics. I have an MAR from RTS. In theology, I’m a Calvinist, creationist, inerrantist, semicessationist, classical Christian theist, and amil (with postmil sympathies). I'm a low churchman with a sympathy for a certain amount of high church symbolism. I’m a pragmatist about church polity. On the sacraments, I take them to be symbolic. I regard other issues in sacramentology as secondary to this primary position. In philosophy, I’m an Augustinian exemplarist. I’m a Cartesian dualist. I’m an alethic realist, but scientific antirealist. I believe in innate ideas, sense knowledge (I'm an indirect realist), and the primacy of divine revelation in Scripture. In ethics, I subscribe to traditional Christian morality, rooted God’s revealed law as the source and standard of personal and social ethics. I also subscribe to a supralapsarian theodicy. Although I’m not a Lutheran, a traditional Lutheran service suits my taste in the style of worship. [https://www.blogger.com/profile/16547070544928321788]

8 posted on 04/02/2015 3:50:49 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear
That was excellent but will go right over the heads of many.

If it is comprehensible by me, anybody can fathom it.

Now, about Steve's creds...

...Say whaaaa?
9 posted on 04/02/2015 4:16:38 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero
>>Now, about Steve's creds...<<

Yeah, obviously I wouldn't be in agreement with him on a lot of things.

10 posted on 04/02/2015 4:23:30 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

Surely that list of labels is meant in jest. If not, I guess I better beef up my description which simply says Christian.


11 posted on 04/02/2015 4:29:41 PM PDT by Kandy Atz ("Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want for bread.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kandy Atz
>>Surely that list of labels is meant in jest.<<

I didn't take it that way. It's his own description and introduction as I understand it. It did leave a rather unpleasant taste didn't it.

12 posted on 04/02/2015 4:33:08 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear
...obviously I wouldn't be in agreement with him on a lot of things.

I might...if I knew what they are.

Except I'm the always hopeful pre-mil.

And I loved visiting my local Lutheran Church just after being found by The Lord. Great music and liturgy, sermon was read word for word (made me feel very religious), but nobody would speak to me or my buddy or shake my hand or even much look at us after that Wednesday evening service. Haven't been back to that particular large and beautiful church.

I wonder if there are still charismatic sub-groups within the Lutheran Church.
13 posted on 04/02/2015 4:33:36 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero
>>I wonder if there are still charismatic sub-groups within the Lutheran Church.<<

I don't know a whole lot about the Lutheran church. What I do know never impressed me. The deeper I look into denominational beliefs the less I think of them.

14 posted on 04/02/2015 4:46:33 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

Yep, never been a fan of the religious labels, or the theological “camps” that people create, as they serve only to divide.


15 posted on 04/02/2015 4:47:24 PM PDT by Kandy Atz ("Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want for bread.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7

Very good info. Hadn’t noticed the relationship between those events, but of course Jesus is the Lamb provided by God. Makes sense.


16 posted on 04/02/2015 4:55:22 PM PDT by Dutchboy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7

you attempt to deny 2,000 years of Christianity in two paragraphs.....lots of luck.


17 posted on 04/03/2015 7:48:03 PM PDT by terycarl (common sense prevails over all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson