Christ Alone is the Only Way of Salvation

“Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.” —Acts 4:12

No one can be saved from sin, its guilt, power, and consequences,—excepting by Jesus Christ…No one can have peace with God the Father,—obtain pardon in this world, and escape wrath to come in the next,—excepting through the atonement and mediation of Jesus Christ.

In Christ alone God’s rich provision of salvation for sinners is treasured up: by Christ alone God’s abundant mercies come down from Heaven to earth. Christ’s blood alone, can cleanse us; Christ’s righteousness alone can clothe us; Christ’s merit alone can give us a title to heaven. Jews and Gentiles, learned and unlearned, kings and poor men,—all alike must either be saved by Jesus or lost for ever.

And the Apostle adds emphatically, “There is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.” There is no other person commissioned, sealed, and appointed by God the Father to be the Saviour of sinners, excepting Christ. The keys of life and death are committed to His hand, and all who would be saved must go to Him.

There was but one place of safety in the day when the flood came upon the earth, and that was Noah’s ark. All other places and devices,—mountains, towers, trees, rafts, boats,—all were alike useless. So also there is but one hiding-place for the sinner who would escape the storm of God’s anger,—he must venture his soul on Christ.

There was but one man to whom the Egyptians could go in the time of famine, when they wanted food,—they must go to Joseph: it was a waste of time to go to any one else. So also there is but One to whom hungering souls must go, if they would not perish for ever,—they must go to Christ.

There was but one word that could save the lives of the Ephraimites in the day when the Gileadites contended with them, and took the fords of Jordan (Judges 12:6),—they must say “Shibboleth,” or die, just so there is but one name that will avail us when we stand at the gate of heaven,—we must name the name of Jesus as our only hope, or be cast away everlastingly.

Such is the doctrine of the text. “No salvation but by Jesus Christ: in Him plenty of salvation,—salvation to the uttermost, salvation for the very chief of sinners;—out of Him no salvation at all.” It is in perfect harmony with our Lord’s own words in St. John: “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by Me.” (John 14:6) It is the same thing that Paul tells the Corinthians: “Other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ.” (1 Cor. 3:11) And the same that John tells us in his first Epistle: “God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in His Son. He that hath the Son hath life, and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life.” (1 John 5:12) All these texts come to one and the same point,—No salvation but by Jesus Christ….You are to venture the whole salvation of your soul on Christ, and on Christ only. You are to cast loose completely and entirely from all other hopes and trusts. You are not to rest partly on Christ,—partly on doing all you can,—partly on keeping your church,—partly on receiving the sacrament. In the matter of your justification Christ is to be all. This is the doctrine of the text.

Remember that heaven is before you, and Christ the only door into it; hell beneath you, and Christ alone able to deliver you from it; the devil behind you, and Christ the only refuge from his wrath and accusations; the law against you, and Christ alone able to redeem you; sin weighing you down, and Christ alone able to put it away. This is the doctrine of the text….

….All through the Bible, from Genesis down to Revelation, there is only one simple account of the way in which man must be saved. It is always the same: only for the sake of our Lord Jesus Christ,—through faith; not for our own works and deservings.

You see it dimly revealed at first: it looms through the mist of a few promises, but there it is.

You have it more plainly afterwards: it is taught by the pictures and emblems of the law of Moses, the schoolmaster dispensation.

You have it still more clearly by and by: the Prophets saw in vision many particulars about the Redeemer yet to come.

You have it fully at last, in the sunshine of New Testament history: Christ incarnate,—Christ crucified, —Christ rising again, Christ preached to the world.

But one golden chain runs through the whole volume; no salvation excepting by Jesus Christ. The bruising of the serpent’s head foretold in the day of the fall; the clothing of our first parents with skins, the sacrifices of Noah, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; the passover, and all the particulars of the Jewish law,—the high priest, altar, the daily offering of the lamb, the holy of holies entered only by blood, the scapegoat, the cities of refuge,—all are so many witnesses to the truth set forth in the text: all preach with one voice, salvation only by Jesus Christ. In fact, this truth appears to me the grand object of the Bible, and all the different parts and portions of the book are meant to pour light upon it. I can gather from it no ideas of pardon and peace with God excepting in connection with this truth. If I could read of one soul in it who was saved without faith in a Saviour, I might perhaps not speak so confidently. But when I see that faith in Christ,—whether a coming Christ or a crucified Christ,—was the prominent feature in the religion of all who went to heaven; when I see Abel owning Christ in his better sacrifice, at one end of the Bible, and the saints in glory in John’s vision rejoicing in Christ, at the other end of the Bible; when I see a man like Cornelius, who was devout, and feared God, and gave alms and prayed, not told that he had done all, and would of course be saved, but ordered to send for Peter, and hear of Christ; when I see all these things I say, I feel bound to believe that the doctrine of the text is the doctrine of the whole Bible. No salvation, no way to heaven, excepting
by Jesus Christ….

….I say calmly that a religion without Christ, a religion that takes away from Christ, a religion that adds anything to Christ, a religion that puts sincerity in the place of Christ,—all are dangerous: all are to be avoided, and all are alike contrary to the doctrine of our text.

You may not like this: I am sorry for it. You think me uncharitable, illiberal, narrow-minded, bigoted, and so forth: be it so….I feel it a duty to bear my solemn testimony against the spirit of the day you live in; to warn you against its infection. It is not Atheism I fear so much, in the present times, as Pantheism. It is not the system which says nothing is true, so much as the system which says everything is true; it is not the system which says there is no Saviour, so much as the system which says there are many saviours and many ways to peace. It is the system which is so liberal that it dares not say anything is false; it is the system which is so charitable that it will allow everything to be true; it is the system which seems ready to honour others as well as our Lord Jesus Christ, class them all together, and hope well of all. Confucius and Zoroaster, Socrates and Mahomet (ie: Mohammed), the Indian Brahmins and the African devil-worshippers, Arius and Pelagius, Ignatius Loyola and Socinus,—all are to be treated respectfully: none are to be condemned. It is the system which bids us smile complacently on all creeds and systems of religion: the Bible and the Koran, the Hindu Vedus and the Persian Zendavesta, the old wives’ fables of Rabbinical writers and the rubbish of Patristic traditions, the Racovian catechism and the thirty-nine Articles, the revelations of Emanuel Swedenborg and the book of Mormon of Joseph Smith,—all are to be listened to: none are to be denounced as lies.

It is the system which is so scrupulous about the feelings of others, that we are never to say they wrong; it is the system which is so liberal that it calls a man a bigot if he dares to say, “I know my views are right.” This is the system, this is the tone of feeling which I fear in this day. This is the system which I desire emphatically to testify against and denounce.

What is it but a bowing down before a great idol specially called liberality? What is it all but a sacrificing of truth upon the altar of a caricature of charity? Beware of it, reader, beware that the rushing stream of public opinion does not carry you away. Beware of it, if you believe the Bible…Has the Lord God spoken to us in the Bible, or has He not? Has He shown us the way of salvation plainly in that Bible, or has He not? Has He declared to us the dangerous state of all out of that way, or has He not? Gird up the loins of your mind, and look these questions fairly in the face, and give them an honest answer. Tell us that there is some other inspired book beside the Bible, and then we shall know what you mean; tell us that the whole Bible is not inspired, and then we shall know where to meet you: but grant for a moment that the Bible, the whole Bible, and nothing but the Bible, is God’s truth., and then I know not in what way you can escape the doctrine of the text. From the liberality which says everybody is right, from the charity which forbids you to say anybody is wrong, from the peace which is bought at the expense of truth,—may the good Lord deliver you!

I speak for myself: I find no resting-place between downright Evangelical Christianity and downright infidelity, whatever others may find. I see no half-way house between them, or houses that are roofless and cannot shelter my weary soul. I can see consistency in an infidel, however much I may pity him; I can see consistency in the full maintenance of Evangelical truth: but as to a middle course between the two,—I cannot see it; and I say so plainly. Let it be called illiberal and uncharitable. I can hear God’s voice nowhere except in the Bible, and I can see no salvation for sinners in the Bible excepting through Jesus Christ. In Him I see abundance: out of Him I see none. And as for those who hold religions in which Christ is not all, whoever they may be, I have a most uncomfortable feeling about their safety. I do not for a moment say that none of them are saved, but I say that those who are saved are saved by their disagreement with their own principles, and in spite of their own system. The man who wrote the famous line,

No, not trying to lead you down a rabbit trail. Just wanting you to think this through carefully. :-)

If I read you right, you understand that in order for Naaman’s leprosy to be cured, he needed to dip in the Jordan by God’s command. He had to do what God said, in the way God said, for the purpose God said.

Otherwise, he’d have just been taking a dip in the crick. Whatcha think?

No, not trying to lead you down a rabbit trail. Just wanting you to think this through carefully. :-) If I read you right, you understand that in order for Naaman’s leprosy to be cured, he needed to dip in the Jordan by God’s command. He had to do what God said, in the way God said, for the purpose God said. Otherwise, he’d have just been taking a dip in the crick. Whatcha think?

I think I don't see what Naaman's heeding or not heeding the word of God's prophet has to do with this thread's main topic. Your point is too vague and obscure for me to comprehend so far. But I bet it is a wonderful point for you to understand. I think we are not disagreeing on anything, though.

I don’t mean to be obscure. The question I’m addressing (and maybe you knew the answer already) is whether baptism has its intended effect (remission of sins) when the person is baptized for some other reason.

I’m sure you can think of plenty of other examples besides Naaman. Like Joshua and the Israelites marching around Jericho. (If they had just gone out for a daily stroll, and an extra long stroll on day 7...) Or Noah. (”Hey honey, let’s take the kids for a little boat ride!”)

Additionally .... if baptism had ANYTHING to do with being saved .... WHY was Jesus baptised ?

I've had that replied to as;
It is a sign from Jesus to show us how to be saved

... and I conclude;

Exactly ... it is a sign ... a symbol of recognition ... like a wedding ring ...

Not for ME ... but to others, and certainly not to God, because we were saved WAAYYYY before we get to the water.

1 Peter 3 is quite fascinating, in it is an intriguing reference to some of what Christ was doing after death and with reference to the flood. Have you ever tried reading the Amplified Bible? It doesn’t flow (and Psalms wouldn’t be much fun), but it does offer clarity.

“21 And baptism, which is a figure [of their deliverance], does now also save you [from inward questioning and fears], not by the removing of outward body filth [bathing], but by [providing you with] the answer of a good and clear conscience (inward cleanliness and peace) before God [because you are demonstrating what you believe to be yours] through the resurrection of Jesus Christ.”

We are under new management, so yes, we obey God, but it is important to understand that our salvation rests not on this but on the redemption offered by God. A “figure” is a representation of something else, and that is vitally important to remember.

When reading the Amplified Bible, it’s important to remember that the stuff in [brackets] and (parentheses) is not part of the Bible. It’s not what the inspired writers wrote, but has been inserted by uninspired men to explain what they THINK the inspired writers meant.

I’m not opposed to hearing what men think the Bible means. But let them explain why, and make their case. If it fits what the Bible says, and helps me understand what the Bible writers wrote, then it’s benficial. The Amplified Bible skips over this important step, so I skip over the Amplified Bible. :-)

I’m not referencing the stuff in the brackets but the correct translation of the word “figure” which most translations stumble over and consequently can be deceptive on. Ignore the stuff in the brackets, it’s choppy but it comes to the same.

I see what you're saying now. Okay, let's read it without the commentary (vv. 20-21):

"who long before in the days of Noah had been disobedient, when God’s patience waited during the building of the ark in which a few, actually eight in number, were saved through water. And baptism, which is a figure, does now also save you, not by the removing of outward body filth, but by the answer of a good and clear conscience before God through the resurrection of Jesus Christ."

Now we can note the resemblances between Noah's salvation and the salvation of the sinner from sin:

1. There is salvation in both cases - Noah from drowning, and the sinner from sin and condemnation.

2. Water is used in both cases.

3. In each case, the water is the means or instrument of the salvation.

The Amplified Bible does a good job of addressing the more difficult verses of the Bible. Difficult in the manner of a â€˜cleanâ€™ translation from Greek to English. The word order in most English Bibles for the 1 Peter 3 quote seem to be awkward. Especially dealing with parenthetical phrases from one language to the other.

The figure means that the water baptism which we do undertake is a representation of something else which is beyond our power which is through the resurrection of Christ. The water baptism then appears to be more a way to show which team we are on, the symbolism is less important than the faith behind it in accepting the gift of salvation through Christ’s sacrifice. Those people in the Ark were saved by an absence of water which underscores that it is not the symbol that saves us, it is the acceptance that what God says is true in spite of any appearance to the contrary.

Numbers 21 contains another Old Testament illustration of this principle.

The reference you gave to Numbers 21 is an excellent one. Here's Jesus' reference to it:

"And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up" - John 3:14

You've spotted the "figure" aspect of both cases. (The Greek word, by the way, is antitupos, from which we get our English word "anti-type", and is variously translated as "a true likeness", "the like figure", "is like that", "which corresponds to this", etc. Take a look here.)

So was Jesus lifted up? Or was He just speaking symbolically?

So both actually took place. Neither one was merely figurative, they were both actual events. They're similar in the lifting up.

Likewise, both Noah's salvation and the salvation of the sinner take place. They're similar in the element of water.

This is why Peter says water saved Noah, and water baptism saves us.

It's not "a way to show which team we are on", but how we sign up for that team. It's not that "the symbolism is less important than the faith behind it in accepting the gift of salvation through Christ’s sacrifice." Rather, baptism is an act of obedience to God in faith, and by it we receive the gift of salvation made available through Christ's sacrifice.

That's why Peter says baptism saves us: "And baptism, which is a figure, does now also save you" (Amplified Bible)

So then we can agree it is not the symbol that saves a person but obedient acceptance of the mercy of God?

There is nothing inherent in the water that saves, as God saved based on the acceptance of His gift both by keeping Noah and his household dry while submerging the rest of the world and by submerging the believer while keeping the rest of the world dry. You would do just as well to look at a snake on a stick if that is what God says to do.

By the way, I am baptised :)

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.